Hu W W, Long G D, Stockerl-Goldstein K E, Johnston L J, Chao N J, Negrin R S, Blume K G
Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, California 94305, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Nov;5(11):3411-8.
Dose-intensive chemotherapy appears to be important in the treatment of patients with recurrent solid tumors. Expanding upon our prior experience, we report the results of our most recent approach to administering dose-intensive therapy using four cycles of moderately high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic cell support for patients with metastatic breast cancer. This outpatient therapy includes high-dose melphalan, thiotepa, and paclitaxel for two cycles followed by mitoxantrone, thiotepa, and paclitaxel for two cycles, with each cycle supported with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs). Between December 1994 and June 1996, 16 patients with recurrent or refractory breast cancer were enrolled in this prospective study. They had received a median of two previous chemotherapy regimens, with a median of nine prior cycles of chemotherapy. For mobilization of autologous PBPCs, patients received cyclophosphamide, 4 g/m2, followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). PBPCs were collected by apheresis. Each day's collection was divided into four equal fractions, and each fraction was infused after each cycle of combination therapy. Cycles 1 and 2 consisted of melphalan, 80 mg/m2, thiotepa, 300 mg/m2, and paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2. Cycles 3 and 4 were comprised of mitoxantrone, 30 mg/m2, and thiotepa and paclitaxel at the same doses as in the first two cycles. The cyclophosphamide infusion was administered in the hospital, whereas all subsequent infusions of chemotherapy and PBPCs were performed on an outpatient basis. The first seven patients were randomized to receive alternate cycle G-CSF or placebo on day +1 of each cycle. Including the initial pulse of cyclophosphamide, 67 (84%) of a planned 80 total courses of chemotherapy were delivered. Of the planned 64 cycles of high-dose combination chemotherapy, 52 cycles (81%) were delivered. Treatment was discontinued for progressive disease (one patient) or morbidity (five patients). Twelve of 16 patients completed at least three cycles of therapy. Nine patients completed all four cycles. One death resulted from fungal sepsis. In 20 cycles delivered to the first seven patients, day +1 G-CSF versus placebo was administered, with a median WBC recovery of 10 versus 13 days, respectively (P = 0.048 in cycle 1). The median duration of response was almost 9 months, and the median survival was 18 months after therapy. With a median follow-up of 1.5 years and longest follow-up of 4.2 years, two patients continue to be without evidence of disease. The 3-year event-free survival, freedom from progression, and overall survival are 19%, 20%, and 31%, respectively. This four-cycle regimen of high-dose combination therapy supported with hematopoietic progenitor cells is feasible, but it is associated with a range of posttransplant complications. The efficacy of such a treatment would have to be substantially superior to that of other currently available therapies, including single autologous transplant procedures, to justify the prolonged period of treatment, multiple episodes of pancytopenia, and associated toxicities, including infectious risks. G-CSF administration after each PBPC infusion appears to accelerate time to neutrophil recovery but does not affect red cell or platelet engraftment.
剂量密集化疗在复发性实体瘤患者的治疗中似乎很重要。基于我们之前的经验,我们报告了我们最近采用的一种方法的结果,即对转移性乳腺癌患者使用四个周期的中等高剂量化疗并辅以造血细胞支持来实施剂量密集治疗。这种门诊治疗包括两个周期的高剂量美法仑、噻替派和紫杉醇,随后是两个周期的米托蒽醌、噻替派和紫杉醇,每个周期均有自体外周血祖细胞(PBPC)支持。1994年12月至1996年6月,16例复发性或难治性乳腺癌患者被纳入这项前瞻性研究。他们之前接受的化疗方案中位数为两种,之前化疗周期的中位数为九个。为动员自体PBPC,患者接受4 g/m²的环磷酰胺,随后给予粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)。通过单采术采集PBPC。每天采集的细胞分为四个相等的部分,每个部分在联合治疗的每个周期后输注。第1和第2周期包括80 mg/m²的美法仑、300 mg/m²的噻替派和200 mg/m²的紫杉醇。第3和第4周期由30 mg/m²的米托蒽醌以及与前两个周期相同剂量的噻替派和紫杉醇组成。环磷酰胺输注在医院进行,而所有后续的化疗和PBPC输注均在门诊进行。前七名患者被随机分配在每个周期的第+1天接受交替周期的G-CSF或安慰剂。包括环磷酰胺的初始脉冲在内,计划的80个化疗疗程中实际完成了67个(84%)。在计划的64个高剂量联合化疗周期中,完成了52个周期(81%)。治疗因疾病进展(1例患者)或发病(5例患者)而中断。16例患者中有12例完成了至少三个周期的治疗。9例患者完成了全部四个周期。1例患者死于真菌败血症。在前七名患者接受的20个周期中,分别在第+1天给予G-CSF和安慰剂,中性粒细胞恢复的中位数分别为10天和13天(第1周期中P = 0.048)。缓解的中位数持续时间近9个月,治疗后的中位生存期为18个月。中位随访1.5年,最长随访4.2年,两名患者仍无疾病证据。3年无事件生存率、无进展生存率和总生存率分别为19%、20%和31%。这种由造血祖细胞支持的四个周期高剂量联合治疗方案是可行的,但与一系列移植后并发症相关。这种治疗的疗效必须显著优于其他目前可用的治疗方法,包括单次自体移植程序,才能证明其延长的治疗期、多次全血细胞减少发作以及相关毒性(包括感染风险)是合理的。每次PBPC输注后给予G-CSF似乎可加速中性粒细胞恢复时间,但不影响红细胞或血小板植入。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996-12