Peper C E, Carson R G
Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. C_E_Peper@ FBW.VU.NL
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Dec;129(3):417-32. doi: 10.1007/s002210050909.
Interactions between rhythmically moving limbs typically result in attraction to a limited number of coordination modes, which are distinguished in terms of their stability. In addition, the stability of coordination typically decreases with elevations in movement frequency. To gain more insight into the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying these stability characteristics, the effects of phasic voluntary muscle activation onto the movement pattern of the contralateral limb as well as onto the stability of interlimb coordination were examined. This was done in circumstances in which a minimal degree of movement-elicited afferent information was available to mediate the coupling influences. The task involved rhythmic application of isometric torque by one hand, while the other hand was moving rhythmically with unconstrained amplitude. The effects of two levels of applied torque, two coordination patterns (inphase and antiphase), and two movement frequencies were determined, both at the behavioural level (movement kinematics and kinetics) and the neuromuscular level (EMG). The isometric applications of torque clearly influenced the muscle-activation profile and movement pattern of the other limb, affecting both temporal variability and amplitude. Surprisingly, there were no differences between the two coordination patterns or between the tempo conditions. As such, the results did not conform to the Haken-Kelso-Bunz model for rhythmic movement coordination. These data suggest that the archetypal differences in stability of rhythmic bimanual coordination are contingent upon a correspondence between the limbs in terms of their respective tasks. This interpretation is elaborated in terms of the role of sensory feedback and the functional specificity of motor unit recruitment in rhythmic interlimb coordination.
有节奏地运动的肢体之间的相互作用通常会导致趋向于有限数量的协调模式,这些模式根据其稳定性而有所区别。此外,协调的稳定性通常会随着运动频率的提高而降低。为了更深入了解这些稳定性特征背后的神经生理机制,研究了阶段性随意肌肉激活对另一侧肢体运动模式以及肢体间协调稳定性的影响。这是在运动引发的传入信息最少的情况下进行的,以介导耦合影响。任务包括一只手有节奏地施加等长扭矩,而另一只手以不受约束的幅度有节奏地运动。确定了两种施加扭矩水平、两种协调模式(同相和反相)以及两种运动频率在行为水平(运动运动学和动力学)和神经肌肉水平(肌电图)上的影响。等长扭矩的施加明显影响了另一只肢体的肌肉激活情况和运动模式,对时间变异性和幅度都有影响。令人惊讶的是,两种协调模式之间或节奏条件之间没有差异。因此,结果不符合哈肯-凯尔索-布恩兹的有节奏运动协调模型。这些数据表明,有节奏的双手协调稳定性的典型差异取决于肢体在各自任务方面的对应关系。这一解释从感觉反馈的作用和运动单位募集在有节奏的肢体间协调中的功能特异性方面进行了阐述。