Fisher M D, Reddy V R, Williams F M, Lin K Y, Thacker J G, Edlich R F
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville 22908, USA.
J Emerg Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;17(6):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00133-x.
Biomechanical performance studies were undertaken for powder-free, latex and nitrile examination gloves. Using standardized tests, examination glove performance was judged by measuring glove thickness, glove puncture force, glove tape adhesion force, glove donning force, glove stiffness, and immediate unrecovered stretch. Even though the nitrile examination gloves were thinner than the latex examination gloves, they exhibited a greater puncture resistance. In addition, tape adherence to the N-Dex nitrile glove was the lowest. Moreover, measurements of the handling characteristics of the nitrile examination gloves demonstrated that they are an acceptable alternative to latex examination gloves. While these biomechanical studies demonstrate the superiority of the nitrile examination gloves, clinical glove evaluation is still needed to determine their performance in the health care setting.
对无粉、乳胶和腈类检查手套进行了生物力学性能研究。通过标准化测试,通过测量手套厚度、手套穿刺力、手套胶带粘附力、手套穿戴力、手套硬度和即时未恢复拉伸来判断检查手套的性能。尽管腈类检查手套比乳胶检查手套薄,但它们表现出更高的抗穿刺性。此外,胶带与N-Dex腈类手套的粘附力最低。此外,对腈类检查手套操作特性的测量表明,它们是乳胶检查手套的可接受替代品。虽然这些生物力学研究证明了腈类检查手套的优越性,但仍需要进行临床手套评估以确定它们在医疗环境中的性能。