Suppr超能文献

大网膜和网膜附件梗死:诊断、流行病学及自然史

Infarction of omentum and epiploic appendage: diagnosis, epidemiology and natural history.

作者信息

van Breda Vriesman A C, Lohle P N, Coerkamp E G, Puylaert J B

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Westeinde Hospital, The Hague, Lijnbaan 32, P. O. Box 432, NL-2501 CK, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 1999;9(9):1886-92. doi: 10.1007/s003300050942.

Abstract

Epiploic appendicitis and segmental omentum infarction are considered to be rare conditions, which may mimic an abdominal surgical emergency. The purpose of our study was to describe clinical findings, US and CT appearance of infarction of an epiploic appendage and omentum, and to determine their epidemiological characteristics and natural history. We retrospectively studied clinical, US and CT findings at hospital admission and follow-up of all patients who were diagnosed at our institution with epiploic appendicitis or omentum infarction between June 1988 and November 1997. We found a relatively high incidence of 40 cases: 20 patients with epiploic appendicitis, 11 with omentum infarction, and 9 in whom it was not possible to discriminate between the both. All 40 patients recovered under conservative treatment without complications. We conclude that US and CT features allow a reliable diagnosis, thereby obviating unnecessary surgery. Discriminating between both conditions is of no practical relevance since treatment and prognosis are identical.

摘要

网膜性阑尾炎和节段性网膜梗死被认为是罕见病症,可能会被误诊为腹部外科急症。我们研究的目的是描述网膜附件和网膜梗死的临床表现、超声及CT表现,并确定其流行病学特征和自然病程。我们回顾性研究了1988年6月至1997年11月期间在我院诊断为网膜性阑尾炎或网膜梗死的所有患者入院时及随访时的临床、超声和CT检查结果。我们发现发病率相对较高,共40例:20例网膜性阑尾炎患者,11例网膜梗死患者,9例无法区分两者。所有40例患者经保守治疗均康复,无并发症。我们得出结论,超声和CT特征有助于做出可靠诊断,从而避免不必要的手术。区分这两种病症并无实际意义,因为治疗方法和预后相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验