• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同双氯芬酸制剂在健康志愿者中的相对生物利用度。

Comparative bioavailability of two different diclofenac formulations in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Silva L C, Simões I G, Lerner F E, Belém G R, de Moraes M E, De Nucci G

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Campinas University, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1999 Nov;49(11):920-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300527.

DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1300527
PMID:10604045
Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the bioequivalence of two different diclofenac (CAS 15307-86-5) formulations (diclofenac free acid suspension as test formulation and diclofenac resinate suspension, Cataflam, as reference formulation) in 24 healthy volunteers. After an overnight fast, the volunteers received a single oral dose (50 mg) of each formulation, following an open, randomized, two-period crossover design, with a fourteen-day washout interval between doses. Serum samples were obtained over a 24-h interval post-dosing, and were analysed for their diclofenac content by HPLC-UV. No adverse effect was reported for any of the formulations administered. Geometric mean test/reference individual ratios were: 92.8% for AUC(0-24 h), 93.2% for AUC(0-infinity), 117.2% for Cmax, 131.0% for Ke and 76.2% for T1/2. The variability of Cmax parameter expressed as CV was greater than 25%. Since the 90% CI for AUC(0-24 h) mean ratio were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, it can be concluded that diclofenac free acid formulation is bioequivalent to diclofenac resinate formulation for the extent of absorption. Since the European Community Agency accepts a 90% CI for Cmax of 70-143%, it can be concluded that diclofenac free acid formulation is bioequivalent to diclofenac resinate formulation for both the rate and the extent of absorption after single dose administration.

摘要

本研究旨在评估两种不同双氯芬酸(CAS 15307-86-5)制剂(双氯芬酸游离酸混悬液作为试验制剂,双氯芬酸树脂酸盐混悬液,凯扶兰,作为参比制剂)在24名健康志愿者体内的生物等效性。经过一夜禁食后,志愿者按照开放、随机、两周期交叉设计,接受每种制剂的单次口服剂量(50毫克),两次给药之间有14天的洗脱期。给药后24小时内采集血清样本,并用高效液相色谱-紫外法分析其中双氯芬酸的含量。所给药的任何制剂均未报告有不良反应。几何平均试验/参比个体比率分别为:AUC(0 - 24小时)为92.8%,AUC(0 - 无穷大)为93.2%,Cmax为117.2%,Ke为131.0%,T1/2为76.2%。以变异系数(CV)表示的Cmax参数的变异性大于25%。由于AUC(0 - 24小时)平均比率的90%置信区间在食品药品监督管理局提议的80 - 125%区间内,因此可以得出结论,就吸收程度而言,双氯芬酸游离酸制剂与双氯芬酸树脂酸盐制剂生物等效。由于欧洲共同体机构接受Cmax的90%置信区间为70 - 143%,因此可以得出结论,单次给药后,就吸收速率和程度而言,双氯芬酸游离酸制剂与双氯芬酸树脂酸盐制剂生物等效。

相似文献

1
Comparative bioavailability of two different diclofenac formulations in healthy volunteers.两种不同双氯芬酸制剂在健康志愿者中的相对生物利用度。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1999 Nov;49(11):920-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300527.
2
Comparative in vitro dissolution and in vivo bioequivalence of two diclofenac enteric coated formulations.两种双氯芬酸肠溶制剂的体外溶出度比较及体内生物等效性研究
Arzneimittelforschung. 2011;61(10):566-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300554.
3
Bioavailability of two oral-tablet and two oral-suspension formulations of naproxen sodium/paracetamol (acetaminophen): single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-period crossover comparisons in healthy Mexican adult subjects.两种萘普生钠/对乙酰氨基酚口服片剂和两种口服混悬剂的生物利用度:在健康墨西哥成年受试者中进行的单剂量、随机、开放标签、两阶段交叉比较。
Clin Ther. 2009 Feb;31(2):399-410. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.02.002.
4
Bioavailability of two oral suspension and two oral tablet formulations of acyclovir 400 mg: two single-dose, open-label, randomized, two-period crossover comparisons in healthy Mexican adult subjects.400毫克阿昔洛韦的两种口服混悬剂和两种口服片剂剂型的生物利用度:在健康墨西哥成年受试者中进行的两项单剂量、开放标签、随机、两期交叉比较。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1146-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.007.
5
Differential pharmacokinetics of diclofenac potassium for oral solution vs immediate-release tablets from a randomized trial: effect of fed and fasting conditions.随机试验中口服溶液与普通片的双氯芬酸钾的药代动力学差异:进食与禁食状态的影响。
Headache. 2015 Feb;55(2):265-75. doi: 10.1111/head.12483. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
6
Comparative bioavailability of two suspension formulations of potassium diclofenac in healthy male volunteers.双氯芬酸钾两种混悬液制剂在健康男性志愿者中的相对生物利用度。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994 Mar;32(3):131-5.
7
Bioequivalence study of a fixed dose combination tablet containing rabeprazole and diclofenac sodium in healthy Indian subjects.雷贝拉唑和双氯芬酸钠固定剂量复方片剂在健康印度受试者中的生物等效性研究。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2010;60(8):506-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296319.
8
Comparative bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of investigational enteric- and film-coated formulations of flurbiprofen 100-mg tablets: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-period, two-way crossover study in healthy Pakistani male volunteers.氟比洛芬 100 毫克肠溶片和薄膜包衣片的人体相对生物利用度和药代动力学研究:健康巴基斯坦男性志愿者单次、随机、开放、两周期、两交叉研究。
Clin Ther. 2010 Mar;32(3):607-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.03.009.
9
Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of bromazepam in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者中溴西泮两种口服制剂的相对生物利用度。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2001;51(12):955-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300144.
10
Relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of piroxicam 20 mg: a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult volunteers.两种 20 毫克吡罗昔康口服制剂的相对生物利用度:在健康墨西哥成年志愿者中进行的单次、随机、开放标签、两周期交叉比较研究。
Clin Ther. 2010 Feb;32(2):357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.02.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Square Wave Voltammetric Determination of Diclofenac in Pharmaceutical Preparations and Human Serum.方波伏安法测定药物制剂和人血清中的双氯芬酸
Iran J Pharm Res. 2015 Summer;14(3):715-22.