Agostoni A, Cicardi M, Cugno M, Zingale L C, Gioffré D, Nussberger J
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Milan, IRCCS Ospedale, Maggiore, Italy.
Immunopharmacology. 1999 Oct 15;44(1-2):21-5. doi: 10.1016/s0162-3109(99)00107-1.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor associated angioedema was detected in 39 subjects (17%) of 231 consecutive patients examined in the last 5 years at our out-patient clinic for symptoms of angioedema without urticaria. In these patients, angioedema was most commonly localized to the face. The duration of ACE-inhibitor treatment at the onset of angioedema ranged from 1 day to 8 years with a median of 6 months. The time elapsed between onset of angioedema and withdrawal of ACE-inhibitor ranged from 1 day to 10 years with a median of 10 months. Delayed diagnosis is explained by the unusual characteristics of this adverse reaction: angioedema may start years after beginning the treatment and then it recurs irregularly. In fact, ACE-inhibitors seem to facilitate angioedema in predisposed subjects, rather than causing it with an allergic or idiosyncratic mechanism. Thus, while Cl-inhibitor levels are usually normal in subjects developing ACE-inhibitor-dependent angioedema, we found that ACE-inhibitors caused angioedema in Cl-inhibitor-deficient patients. Because the main inactivator of bradykinin is kininase II, which is identical with ACE, it is believed that bradykinin mediates ACE-inhibitor-dependent angioedema. We had the possibility to examine the plasma bradykinin levels in one ACE-inhibitor-treated patient during an angioedema attack and we found very high levels, but we did not find an increase of break-down products of high-molecular-weight-kininogen as observed during acute attacks in hereditary angioedema. Bradykinin fell to normal levels during remission after withdrawal of the drug. These observations indicate that in ACE-inhibitor-induced angioedema, contrary to hereditary angioedema, the reduction of bradykinin catabolic rate plays a predominant role.
在过去5年里,我们门诊连续检查的231例无荨麻疹的血管性水肿患者中,有39例(17%)检测到血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂相关的血管性水肿。在这些患者中,血管性水肿最常见于面部。血管性水肿发作时ACE抑制剂治疗的持续时间为1天至8年,中位数为6个月。血管性水肿发作至停用ACE抑制剂的时间间隔为1天至10年,中位数为10个月。延迟诊断是由于这种不良反应的不寻常特征:血管性水肿可能在开始治疗数年之后才开始,然后不定期复发。事实上,ACE抑制剂似乎是在易感人群中促进血管性水肿,而非通过过敏或特异反应机制引发。因此,虽然在发生依赖ACE抑制剂的血管性水肿的患者中,C1抑制剂水平通常正常,但我们发现ACE抑制剂在C1抑制剂缺乏的患者中会引发血管性水肿。由于缓激肽的主要灭活剂是激肽酶II,它与ACE相同,因此人们认为缓激肽介导了依赖ACE抑制剂的血管性水肿。我们有机会在一名接受ACE抑制剂治疗的患者血管性水肿发作期间检测其血浆缓激肽水平,发现水平非常高,但我们未发现遗传性血管性水肿急性发作期间观察到的高分子量激肽原分解产物增加。停药后缓解期缓激肽降至正常水平。这些观察结果表明,与遗传性血管性水肿相反,在ACE抑制剂诱导的血管性水肿中,缓激肽分解代谢率降低起主要作用。