Nesković-Konstantinović Z, Nikolić-Vukosavljević D, Branković-Magić M, Kanjer K, Gavrilović D, Mitrović L, Borojević N, Vukotić D, Spuzić I
Dept. Medical Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Jugoslavia.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Sep;18(3):347-55.
Epidermal growth factor receptor was determined in 106 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, using the biochemical method. The group consisted of 58 patients in stage I-II, and 48 patients in stage III-IV. Although a significant inverse correlation was found between EGF-R status, and ER or PR status, quantitative content of EGF-R did not correlate either with quantitative ER, or PR levels. The ER/PR content was similar in all clinical stages, suggesting their stability during the clinical course of the disease. EGF-R content was significantly higher in stage IV, compared to stage I, while intermediate clinical stages and all substages did not differ according to the EGF-R content. EGF-R was confirmed as a weak prognostic factor within clinical stages. However, in a whole group, the overall survival was significantly better in patients whose tumors EGF-R content was lower than 26 fmol/mg, compared to those with higher ERF-R content. EGF-R content was highly predictive for the response to systemic endocrine treatment, in metastatic breast cancer patients. In locally advanced breast cancer a trend towards higher levels of EGF-R was found in inflammatory breast cancers, compared to non-inflammatory ones. Slightly higher levels were found in responders to local non-endocrine primary treatments (radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy), compared to non-responders, suggesting the possible predictive role of EGF-R for the response to such treatments. Our results emphasized the usefulness of quantitative receptor determination suggesting the relative stability of EGF-R content during the clinical course of breast cancer, its independence from ER, its significant predictive and weak prognostic values, and a possible correlation with the aggressiveness of the disease, and response to non-endocrine treatments.
采用生化方法对106例新诊断的乳腺癌患者进行了表皮生长因子受体检测。该组包括58例Ⅰ - Ⅱ期患者和48例Ⅲ - Ⅳ期患者。虽然发现表皮生长因子受体(EGF-R)状态与雌激素受体(ER)或孕激素受体(PR)状态之间存在显著的负相关,但EGF-R的定量含量与ER或PR的定量水平均无相关性。ER/PR含量在所有临床分期中相似,表明它们在疾病临床过程中具有稳定性。与Ⅰ期相比,Ⅳ期的EGF-R含量显著更高,而中间临床分期和所有亚分期在EGF-R含量方面并无差异。在临床分期内,EGF-R被确认为一个较弱的预后因素。然而,在整个组中,肿瘤EGF-R含量低于26 fmol/mg的患者的总生存期明显优于EGF-R含量较高的患者。在转移性乳腺癌患者中,EGF-R含量对全身内分泌治疗的反应具有高度预测性。在局部晚期乳腺癌中,与非炎性乳腺癌相比,炎性乳腺癌中EGF-R水平有升高趋势。与无反应者相比,局部非内分泌初次治疗(放疗加或不加化疗)的反应者中EGF-R水平略高,提示EGF-R对这类治疗反应可能具有预测作用。我们的结果强调了定量受体检测的有用性,表明EGF-R含量在乳腺癌临床过程中相对稳定,其与ER无关,具有显著的预测价值和较弱的预后价值,并且可能与疾病的侵袭性及对非内分泌治疗的反应相关。