Dahshan A, Lin C H, Peters J, Thomas R, Tolia V
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Dec;94(12):3497-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01613.x.
We performed a prospective, randomized, single-blind study in children undergoing colonoscopy to evaluate the acceptance and efficacy of three different bowel preparations.
Seventy patients (ages 3-20 yr, 38 males) were randomly assigned to one of the three study preparations: Magnesium citrate with X-prep and clear liquid diet for 2 days (group A); Dulcolax for 2 days and Fleet enema without dietary restriction (group B); and Golytely 20 ml/kg (up to 1 L) per hour for 4 h with clear liquid diet for 1 day (group C). Endoscopists blinded to bowel preparation graded the adequacy of colon cleansing. The preparations were rated by patients for tolerance, willingness to retake them, adverse effects, and compliance.
Data analysis using Fisher exact test and trend test showed that colon cleansing in groups A and C was superior to that in group B (p < 0.0001) and better in group C than A (p < 0.075). Overall tolerance and compliance were significantly better for groups A and B than group C (p < 0.003), but not different between A and B. More of group B patients were willing to retake the preparation than in group C (p < 0.002) and group A (p < 0.05), but this was not different between groups A and C. Adverse effects were reported more frequently by patients in group C than in groups A and B (p < 0.01).
Although the least well tolerated, Golytely provided the best cleansing. Dulcolax without dietary restriction provided unsatisfactory colon cleansing. Magnesium citrate with X-prep was acceptable and provided good cleansing.
我们对接受结肠镜检查的儿童进行了一项前瞻性、随机、单盲研究,以评估三种不同肠道准备方法的接受度和效果。
70例患者(年龄3 - 20岁,男性38例)被随机分配至三种研究准备方法之一:服用柠檬酸镁加X - 制剂并进行2天清液饮食(A组);服用杜秘克2天且使用弗利特灌肠剂且无饮食限制(B组);每小时服用20 ml/kg(最多1 L)的聚乙二醇电解质散共4小时并进行1天清液饮食(C组)。对肠道准备情况不知情的内镜医师对结肠清洁程度进行分级。患者对这些准备方法的耐受性、再次使用意愿、不良反应及依从性进行评分。
使用Fisher精确检验和趋势检验进行数据分析显示,A组和C组的结肠清洁效果优于B组(p < 0.0001),且C组优于A组(p < 0.075)。A组和B组的总体耐受性和依从性显著优于C组(p < 0.003),但A组和B组之间无差异。B组中愿意再次使用该准备方法的患者比C组(p < 0.002)和A组(p < 0.05)更多,但A组和C组之间无差异。C组患者报告的不良反应比A组和B组更频繁(p < 0.01)。
尽管聚乙二醇电解质散耐受性最差,但清洁效果最佳。无饮食限制的杜秘克结肠清洁效果不理想。柠檬酸镁加X - 制剂可接受且清洁效果良好。