Young H, Rossiter K, Wang M, Miller M
The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd., Mt. Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92 169, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Agric Food Chem. 1999 Dec;47(12):5173-7. doi: 10.1021/jf990276u.
Changes in aroma of apple harvested at four different maturities were measured at harvest and after short-term storage using electronic aroma sensors ("electronic nose") and classical headspace/gas chromatography methods. Stored fruits were also evaluated by a trained sensory panel. Compared with headspace/gas chromatography, the electronic nose was found to be more sensitive ( approximately 40 times) in terms of sample size. The sampling procedure for the electronic nose was much less complex. Using discriminant function analysis, both methods classified the apples tested into groups according to harvest date. After storage, the groupings were more diffuse. Results from sensory testing showed partial separation along the first linear discriminant but did not classify the apple into distinct groups. Important differences between treatments were found for "overall flavor", "acid flavor" intensity, "crispness", "cider/fermented aroma", "vegetative aroma", and "canned pear aroma".
使用电子香气传感器(“电子鼻”)和传统的顶空/气相色谱法,在收获时和短期储存后,对四种不同成熟度采收的苹果的香气变化进行了测定。还通过训练有素的感官小组对储存的水果进行了评估。与顶空/气相色谱法相比,发现电子鼻在样品量方面更灵敏(约40倍)。电子鼻的采样程序要简单得多。使用判别函数分析,两种方法都根据收获日期将测试的苹果分为不同组。储存后,分组更加分散。感官测试结果显示,沿着第一个线性判别值有部分分离,但没有将苹果分为不同的组。在“总体风味”、“酸味强度”、“脆度”、“苹果酒/发酵香气”、“植物香气”和“梨罐头香气”方面,发现不同处理之间存在重要差异。