Suppr超能文献

慢性髓性白血病同种异体移植后复发的供体淋巴细胞输注单剂量与递增剂量方案的比较

Comparison of single-dose and escalating-dose regimens of donor lymphocyte infusion for relapse after allografting for chronic myeloid leukemia.

作者信息

Dazzi F, Szydlo R M, Craddock C, Cross N C, Kaeda J, Chase A, Olavarria E, van Rhee F, Kanfer E, Apperley J F, Goldman J M

机构信息

Department of Haematology, Imperial College School of Medicine at Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Blood. 2000 Jan 1;95(1):67-71.

Abstract

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was originally administered as a single, relatively large dose of lymphocytes called a bulk dose regimen (BDR). It has since been suggested that the use of an escalating dose regimen (EDR) may be equally effective against leukemia while it induces less graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We therefore compared the efficacy and incidence of complications in a nonrandomized sequential study of the 2 regimens in 48 consecutive patients who had relapses with cytogenetic or hematologic evidence of chronic myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Twenty-eight patients were treated on a BDR (August 1990 to November 1995) and 20 were treated on an EDR (December 1995 to January 1998). Although the probability of achieving cytogenetic remission within 2 years of starting DLI did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (EDR, 91% [CI, 63%-98%] vs. BDR, 67% [CI,49%-83%], P =.70), the incidence of GVHD was much lower using EDR (10% vs. 44%, P =.011). When we considered only subsets of patients treated by BDR or EDR who had received comparable total lymphoid cell doses, the incidence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD were both significantly lower for recipients treated by EDR than for recipients treated by BDR (P =.005 and P =.031, respectively). These findings suggest that the incidence of GVHD associated with the EDR is low, not because the final cell dose is small, but because lymphocytes are administered over a considerable number of months. (Blood. 2000;95:67-71)

摘要

供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)最初采用单次相对大剂量的淋巴细胞进行,即大剂量方案(BDR)。此后有人提出,递增剂量方案(EDR)可能对白血病同样有效,同时诱发的移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)较少。因此,我们在一项非随机序贯研究中比较了这两种方案在48例异基因干细胞移植后出现细胞遗传学或血液学证据证实的慢性髓性白血病复发的连续患者中的疗效和并发症发生率。28例患者接受BDR治疗(1990年8月至1995年11月),20例患者接受EDR治疗(1995年12月至1998年1月)。尽管在开始DLI后2年内实现细胞遗传学缓解的概率在两组之间无显著差异(EDR组为91%[CI,63%-98%],BDR组为67%[CI,49%-83%],P = 0.70),但使用EDR时GVHD的发生率要低得多(10%对44%,P = 0.011)。当我们仅考虑接受了相当总淋巴细胞剂量的BDR或EDR治疗的患者亚组时,EDR治疗的受者急性和慢性GVHD的发生率和严重程度均显著低于BDR治疗的受者(分别为P = 0.005和P =  0.031)。这些发现表明,与EDR相关的GVHD发生率低,不是因为最终细胞剂量小,而是因为淋巴细胞在相当长的数月内进行输注。(《血液》。2000年;95:67 - 71)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验