Kovaleski J E, Gurchiek L R, Heitman R J, Hollis J M, Pearsall A W
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile 36688, USA.
Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Dec;20(12):808-14. doi: 10.1177/107110079902001210.
Manual examination is the most common method for the evaluation of ankle anteroposterior (AP) and inversion-eversion (I-E) laxity. Objective assessment data of normal ankle laxity must be provided before comparison with an injured ankle can be made. The purpose of this study was to compare AP translation and I-E rotation at three force loads between dominant and nondominant ankles and to assess the test-retest reliability of a portable arthrometer in obtaining these measurements. The arthrometer consists of a frame that is fixed to the foot, a pad that is attached to the tibia, and a load-measuring handle that is attached to the foot plate through which the load is applied. A six-degrees-of-freedom spatial kinematic linkage system is connected between the tibial pad and the foot frame to measure motion. Instrumented measurement testing of total AP displacement and I-E rotation of both ankles was performed in 41 subjects (21 men and 20 women; mean age, 23.8 +/- 4.4 years). Subjects had no history of ankle injury. Subjects were tested in the supine position while lying on a table with the knee secured in extension and the foot positioned at 0 degrees of flexion. Laxity was measured from total AP displacement (millimeters) during loading to 125 N of AP force and from total I-E rotation (degrees of range of motion) during loading to 4000 N-mm. Reliability was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) at 75 N, 100 N, and 125 N of AP force and at 2000, 3000, and 4000 N-mm torque loads. Mean differences for displacement and rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at each of the force and torque loads were analyzed by dependent t-tests. For both the dominant and nondominant ankles, respectively, the reliability coefficients at each of the force loads for AP displacement (range, 0.82-0.89) and I-E rotation (range, 0.86-0.97) were high. The t-test analyses showed no significant differences (P > or = 0.05) for total AP displacement or I-E rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at any of the force loads. The results are clinically useful in providing information about the reliability of measures at different AP and I-E force loads using a portable ankle ligament arthrometer.
手法检查是评估踝关节前后位(AP)和内翻-外翻(I-E)松弛度最常用的方法。在与受伤踝关节进行比较之前,必须提供正常踝关节松弛度的客观评估数据。本研究的目的是比较优势侧和非优势侧踝关节在三种力负荷下的前后位平移和内翻-外翻旋转,并评估便携式关节测量仪获取这些测量值的重测可靠性。该关节测量仪由固定在足部的框架、连接在胫骨上的衬垫以及通过其施加负荷的附着在脚板上的负荷测量手柄组成。一个六自由度空间运动连杆系统连接在胫骨衬垫和足部框架之间以测量运动。对41名受试者(21名男性和20名女性;平均年龄23.8±4.4岁)的双侧踝关节进行了AP总位移和I-E旋转的仪器测量测试。受试者无踝关节损伤史。受试者仰卧于检查台上,膝关节伸直固定,足部处于0度屈曲位进行测试。在施加125N的AP力时测量加载过程中的AP总位移(毫米),在施加4000N-mm的扭矩负荷时测量加载过程中的I-E总旋转(运动范围度数)来评估松弛度。通过计算在75N、100N和125N的AP力以及2000、3000和4000N-mm扭矩负荷下的组内相关系数(2,1)来评估可靠性。通过配对t检验分析在每个力和扭矩负荷下优势侧和非优势侧踝关节之间位移和旋转的平均差异。对于优势侧和非优势侧踝关节,在每个力负荷下,AP位移(范围0.82 - 0.89)和I-E旋转(范围0.86 - 0.97)的可靠性系数都很高。t检验分析表明,在任何力负荷下,优势侧和非优势侧踝关节之间的AP总位移或I-E旋转均无显著差异(P≥0.05)。这些结果在临床上有助于提供关于使用便携式踝关节韧带关节测量仪在不同AP和I-E力负荷下测量可靠性的信息。