Suppr超能文献

瑞波西汀与丙咪嗪治疗老年抑郁症患者的疗效比较:一项双盲随机试验

Reboxetine versus imipramine in the treatment of elderly patients with depressive disorders: a double-blind randomised trial.

作者信息

Katona C, Bercoff E, Chiu E, Tack P, Versiani M, Woelk H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Middlesex Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 1999 Oct;55(2-3):203-13. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00073-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression in older people is often unrecognised and untreated or under-treated. Antidepressant treatment may itself exacerbate a pre-existing illness, interact with concomitant medications or produce undesirable cognitive and sedative side effects. Newer antidepressants may offer advantages in terms of a lesser burden of adverse effects.

METHODS

The comparative tolerability of the unique selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (selective NRI) reboxetine (4-6 mg/day; n = 176) and that of imipramine (50-100 mg/day; n = 171) was assessed in an elderly ( > 65 years) cohort of depressed or dysthymic patients in an 8-week, double-blind, multicentre trial. Comparative efficacy was also assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 68% of patients in the reboxetine group experienced adverse events compared with 71% in the imipramine group. Reboxetine-treated patients were less likely to develop hypotension and related symptoms (7% vs. imipramine 16%) or cardiovascular disorders (12.5% vs. imipramine 21.1%), while those treated with imipramine were less likely to experience insomnia (6.3% vs. 2.9%). Adverse events were more often assessed as related to treatment (43%) and moderate to severe in intensity (73%) with imipramine than with reboxetine (33% and 65%, respectively). Furthermore, there were fewer serious adverse events in the reboxetine-treated group (P = 0.019). The reduction in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) was comparable between the treatment groups in the total population. At the last assessment, the majority of patients in both treatment groups were assessed as normal to borderline or mildly ill using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. In a subanalysis of the dysthymic patients a modest but significant difference in favour of imipramine was observed for both HAM-D and CGI assessments. This may have been a reflection of a trend towards more severe depressive symptoms at baseline in the reboxetine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Reboxetine is as effective as imipramine in the treatment of depression in elderly patients but is at least as well tolerated with a lower risk of hypotension and related symptoms, fewer serious adverse events, adverse event-related withdrawals and treatment-related adverse events.

摘要

背景

老年人的抑郁症常常未被识别、未得到治疗或治疗不足。抗抑郁药治疗本身可能会加重已有的疾病,与同时服用的药物相互作用,或产生不良的认知和镇静副作用。新型抗抑郁药在不良反应负担较轻方面可能具有优势。

方法

在一项为期8周的双盲多中心试验中,对年龄大于65岁的抑郁或心境恶劣患者队列评估了独特的选择性去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(选择性NRI)瑞波西汀(4 - 6毫克/天;n = 176)和丙咪嗪(50 - 100毫克/天;n = 171)的相对耐受性。还评估了相对疗效。

结果

总体而言,瑞波西汀组68%的患者出现不良事件,而丙咪嗪组为71%。接受瑞波西汀治疗的患者发生低血压及相关症状的可能性较小(7% 对比丙咪嗪组的16%)或心血管疾病的可能性较小(12.5% 对比丙咪嗪组的21.1%),而接受丙咪嗪治疗的患者出现失眠的可能性较小(6.3% 对比2.9%)。与瑞波西汀相比,丙咪嗪导致的不良事件更常被评估为与治疗相关(43% 对比33%)且强度为中度至重度(73% 对比65%)。此外,瑞波西汀治疗组的严重不良事件较少(P = 0.019)。在总体人群中,治疗组之间汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM - D)评分的降低相当。在最后一次评估时,使用临床总体印象(CGI)量表,两个治疗组的大多数患者被评估为正常至临界或轻度患病。在对心境恶劣患者的亚组分析中,观察到在HAM - D和CGI评估方面,丙咪嗪有适度但显著的优势。这可能反映了瑞波西汀组在基线时抑郁症状有更严重的趋势。

结论

瑞波西汀在治疗老年患者抑郁症方面与丙咪嗪一样有效,但至少具有相同的耐受性,且低血压及相关症状风险较低、严重不良事件较少、因不良事件退出治疗的情况较少以及与治疗相关的不良事件较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验