Li Q, Zamorano L, Jiang Z, Gong J X, Pandya A, Perez R, Diaz F
Department of Neurological Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Comput Aided Surg. 1999;4(6):314-21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(1999)4:6<314::AID-IGS3>3.0.CO;2-G.
Application accuracy is a crucial factor for stereotactic surgical localization systems, in which space digitization camera systems are one of the most critical components. In this study we compared the effect of the OPTOTRAK 3020 space digitization system and the FlashPoint Model 3000 and 5000 3D digitizer systems on the application accuracy for interactive localization of intracranial lesions. A phantom was mounted with several implantable frameless markers which were randomly distributed on its surface. The target point was digitized and the coordinates were recorded and compared with reference points. The differences from the reference points represented the deviation from the "true point." The root mean square (RMS) was calculated to show the differences, and a paired t-test was used to analyze the results. The results with the phantom showed that, for 1-mm sections of CT scans, the RMS was 0.76 +/- 0. 54 mm for the OPTOTRAK system, 1.23 +/- 0.53 mm for the FlashPoint Model 3000 3D digitizer system, and 1.00 +/- 0.42 mm for the FlashPoint Model 5000 system. These preliminary results showed that there is no significant difference between the three tracking systems, and, from the quality point of view, they can all be used for image-guided surgery procedures.
应用准确性是立体定向手术定位系统的一个关键因素,其中空间数字化摄像系统是最关键的组件之一。在本研究中,我们比较了OPTOTRAK 3020空间数字化系统以及FlashPoint Model 3000和5000三维数字化仪系统对颅内病变交互式定位应用准确性的影响。一个体模上安装了几个可植入的无框架标记物,这些标记物随机分布在其表面。对目标点进行数字化处理,记录坐标并与参考点进行比较。与参考点的差异代表了与“真实点”的偏差。计算均方根(RMS)以显示差异,并使用配对t检验分析结果。体模实验结果表明,对于1毫米层厚的CT扫描,OPTOTRAK系统的RMS为0.76±0.54毫米,FlashPoint Model 3000三维数字化仪系统为1.23±0.53毫米,FlashPoint Model 5000系统为1.00±0.42毫米。这些初步结果表明,这三种跟踪系统之间没有显著差异,从质量角度来看,它们都可用于图像引导手术程序。