Reardon P R, Preciado A, Scarborough T, Matthews B, Marti J L
Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine and The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999 Dec;9(6):523-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.1999.9.523.
A decade has passed since laparoscopy became a popular tool in general surgery. New technologies continue to surface, and surgeons are still trying to expand the applications of this technique. Parallel to the development of new techniques, we are also measuring the presentation of new complications. Incisional hernias are not new complications. Although their avoidance has been one of the proposed benefits of laparoscopy, several cases of port-site hernias have been reported. Current surgical wisdom suggests closure of 10-mm or larger port sites to avoid herniation. Most surgeons do not routinely close 5-mm port sites, believing that such fascial defects are not large enough to create a significant risk of hernia formation, thus not justifying the extra time and effort needed to close them. Although this practice may be reasonable for most cases, it should be reconsidered in lengthy procedures, particularly if the port has been used for active operative instruments. Under these circumstances, the repetitive motions in different directions may cause the 5-mm defect to enlarge significantly, allowing a hernia of considerable size to develop, with the obvious clinical implications of such a complication. We present a case of a hernia through a 5-mm port site presenting as small-bowel obstruction in the early postoperative period after a laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.
腹腔镜成为普通外科常用工具已有十年。新技术不断涌现,外科医生仍在努力拓展该技术的应用。在新技术发展的同时,我们也在关注新并发症的出现情况。切口疝并非新的并发症。尽管避免切口疝被认为是腹腔镜手术的益处之一,但仍有几例切口疝的报道。目前的外科观点认为,应关闭10毫米及以上的切口以避免疝形成。大多数外科医生通常不常规关闭5毫米的切口,认为这种筋膜缺损不够大,不会产生显著的疝形成风险,因此不值得花费额外的时间和精力去关闭。虽然这种做法在大多数情况下可能合理,但在长时间手术中应重新考虑,特别是当该切口用于操作器械时。在这种情况下,不同方向的反复动作可能导致5毫米的缺损显著扩大,从而形成相当大的疝,这种并发症具有明显的临床意义。我们报告一例在腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术后早期,通过一个5毫米切口出现疝并表现为小肠梗阻的病例。