Bellinger D C
Neuroepidemiology Unit, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2000 Jan-Feb;22(1):133-40. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0362(99)00053-7.
Little attention has been invested in exploring the possibility that the nature or magnitude of a neurotoxicant's health impact on children depends on host characteristics (e.g., sex, age) or contextual factors (e.g., socioeconomic status, other chemical exposures). Such effect modification is a property of a true association, and should be distinguished from confounding. In epidemiologic studies of children, most efforts to identify effect modification have been unsystematic, pursued as part of data analysis rather than of study design. As a result, most samples have insufficient statistical power to characterize effect modification with adequate precision. This may contribute to an inconsistency in results across studies. Failure to assess effect modification adequately may also lead to invalid inferences. If the magnitude of an association between a neurotoxicant exposure and a particular end point varies across strata of a third factor, an estimate that summarizes the association across strata of this factor will be inappropriate, overestimating the association in a stratum in which the association is absent, and underestimating it in a stratum in which it is present. Until such dependencies are identified, our understanding of the mechanism(s) of a compound's neurotoxicity will remain incomplete, as will the knowledge base required to formulate public policy that adequately protects the most sensitive subgroups of the population.
在探索神经毒物对儿童健康影响的性质或程度是否取决于宿主特征(如性别、年龄)或背景因素(如社会经济地位、其他化学物质暴露)方面,投入的关注较少。这种效应修饰是真正关联的一种特性,应与混杂因素区分开来。在儿童流行病学研究中,大多数识别效应修饰的努力都缺乏系统性,是在数据分析过程中进行的,而非作为研究设计的一部分。因此,大多数样本没有足够的统计效力来精确地描述效应修饰。这可能导致不同研究结果之间的不一致。未能充分评估效应修饰也可能导致无效的推断。如果神经毒物暴露与特定终点之间的关联强度在第三个因素的不同分层中有所变化,那么汇总该因素各分层关联的估计值将是不合适的,会高估无关联分层中的关联,而低估有关联分层中的关联。在识别出此类依存关系之前,我们对化合物神经毒性机制的理解仍将不完整,制定充分保护人群中最敏感亚组的公共政策所需的知识库也将不完整。