Mogyoros I, Lin C, Dowla S, Grosskreutz J, Burke D
Department of Neurology, Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Jan;111(1):23-8. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00199-6.
Different indices of axonal excitability are now being measured in human subjects, both normal volunteers undergoing some test manoeuvre and patients with a variety of peripheral nerve disorders. The reproducibility of these indices has not previously been established, and was determined for cutaneous afferents in the median nerve of 12 healthy subjects, using threshold tracking techniques.
Refractoriness and supernormality were determined as the change in stimulus current required to produce a predetermined target potential when conditioned by a supramaximal stimulus at appropriate conditioning-test intervals. Strength-duration time constant was calculated from the threshold currents using unconditioned test stimuli of 0.1 ms and 1.0 ms. The effects of changes in membrane potential on these indices was assessed by applying subthreshold DC currents (from 50% depolarizing to 50% hyperpolarizing), using the reciprocal of threshold (i.e., 'excitability') as an indicator of membrane potential. The intraindividual reproducibility was determined by repeating the study on each subject up to 10 times.
Refractoriness and supernormality were variable between subjects (mean +/- SD of 31.5 +/- 9.5% and 13.2 +/- 3.8%, respectively) and within subjects (coefficient of variation 0.2104 and 0.21849, respectively). TauSD showed even greater interindividual variability (499.2 +/- 115 micros) and intraindividual variability (coefficient of variation 0.2339). The slopes of relationships between each of the indices and axonal 'excitability' suggest that refractoriness is extremely sensitive to changes in excitability (0.9767 +/- 0.1907), tauSD less so (0.3766 +/- 0.1322), supernormality least (0.2223 +/- 0.1268).
Under controlled conditions, refractoriness is the most sensitive and least variable of the indices of axonal excitability. However, small decreases in temperature greatly increase refractoriness but have little effect on tauSD. Given that 3 indices reflect different biophysical mechanisms, nodal and internodal, greater insight into the functional state of peripheral nerve axons will come when there are coherent changes in all 3 indices.
目前正在对人体受试者测量不同的轴突兴奋性指标,包括接受某些测试操作的正常志愿者以及患有各种周围神经疾病的患者。这些指标的可重复性此前尚未确定,本研究使用阈值跟踪技术对12名健康受试者正中神经的皮肤传入神经进行了测定。
不应期和超常期通过在适当的条件刺激 - 测试间隔下,用超强刺激作为条件刺激时,产生预定目标电位所需的刺激电流变化来确定。强度 - 时间常数由0.1毫秒和1.0毫秒的非条件测试刺激的阈值电流计算得出。通过施加阈下直流电流(从50%去极化到50%超极化),使用阈值的倒数(即“兴奋性”)作为膜电位的指标,评估膜电位变化对这些指标的影响。个体内可重复性通过对每个受试者重复研究多达10次来确定。
不应期和超常期在受试者之间(分别为31.5 +/- 9.5%和13.2 +/- 3.8%的平均值 +/- 标准差)以及受试者内部(变异系数分别为0.2104和0.21849)存在差异。强度 - 时间常数显示出更大的个体间变异性(499.2 +/- 115微秒)和个体内变异性(变异系数0.2339)。每个指标与轴突“兴奋性”之间关系的斜率表明,不应期对兴奋性变化极为敏感(0.9767 +/- 0.1907),强度 - 时间常数次之(0.3766 +/- 0.1322),超常期最不敏感(0.2223 +/- 0.1268)。
在受控条件下,不应期是轴突兴奋性指标中最敏感且变异性最小的。然而,温度的小幅下降会大大增加不应期,但对强度 - 时间常数影响很小。鉴于这3个指标反映了不同的生物物理机制,包括节点和节间机制,当所有3个指标都有一致变化时,将能更深入了解周围神经轴突的功能状态。