Kaojarern S, Sriapa C, Sirivarasai J, Tongpoo A, Thareerach M
Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 1999 Nov;82(11):1149-53.
Prescribing brand name versus generic drugs continues to be a controversial issue. The harmful effects of nonequivalence result from either too little or too much drug reaching the patient which will cause either failure of treatment or adverse drug reactions. On the other hand, if physicians prescribe higher priced original drugs instead of therapeutically equivalent lower cost generic drugs to their patients, the patients then have to pay for the added cost. This study was designed to compare the bioavailability of paracetamol of a generic versus original drug. The original brand (Tylenol, Cilag) which was assigned as the reference standard against another generic formulation (Sara, Thai Nakorn Patana). Ten healthy male volunteers aged 20 to 45 years participated in this study. The study was conducted as a cross-over experimental design. The dose was 2 tablets of 500 mg. In conclusion, based on the concentration-time curve and pharmacokinetic analysis there were no statistically significant differences between T1/2 absorption and Cmax. Although AUC of Sara was marginally statistically greater than Tylenol, this magnitude of difference probably has no clinical significance. All these parameters are within the accepted 20 per cent difference, indicating these products are bioequivalent.
开品牌药还是非专利药仍然是一个有争议的问题。不等效的有害影响源于到达患者体内的药物过少或过多,这将导致治疗失败或药物不良反应。另一方面,如果医生给患者开价格更高的原研药而不是治疗等效的低成本非专利药,那么患者就必须支付额外的费用。本研究旨在比较一种非专利药与原研药对乙酰氨基酚的生物利用度。将原品牌药(泰诺,Cilag)指定为参考标准,与另一种非专利制剂(Sara,泰国那空巴吞)进行比较。10名年龄在20至45岁之间的健康男性志愿者参与了本研究。该研究采用交叉实验设计。剂量为2片500毫克。总之,根据浓度-时间曲线和药代动力学分析,T1/2吸收和Cmax之间没有统计学上的显著差异。虽然Sara的AUC在统计学上略高于泰诺,但这种差异程度可能没有临床意义。所有这些参数都在公认的20%差异范围内,表明这些产品具有生物等效性。