Suppr超能文献

团体心理治疗中的替代性情感体验与情感表达

Vicarious emotional experience and emotional expression in group psychotherapy.

作者信息

Rosner R, Beutler L E, Daldrup R J

机构信息

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2000 Jan;56(1):1-10. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(200001)56:1<1::aid-jclp1>3.0.co;2-7.

Abstract

Emotional arousal is a key concept in most theories of change. To be able to understand the role of emotional expression better, two treatments, cognitive therapy (CT) and focused expressive psychotherapy (FEP; a manualized form of Gestalt therapy), with opposite process assumptions about the expression of emotions were compared. Additionally vicarious emotional experience in the sense of an underlying emotional contagion was examined. Clients suffering from major depression were rated for the expression of emotion in three randomly selected sessions of a 20-session treatment course. While the types of emotions generally experienced by CT clients and FEP clients did not differ significantly, differences in the subgroups of active and observing-group members were found. This indicated that the process assumptions made by the respective treatments were only valid for the actively participating clients and not for the observing group members. Emotional contagion as a process was not supported.

摘要

情绪唤起是大多数改变理论中的一个关键概念。为了能更好地理解情绪表达的作用,我们比较了两种疗法,认知疗法(CT)和聚焦表达性心理治疗(FEP;格式塔疗法的一种手册化形式),它们对情绪表达有着相反的过程假设。此外,还考察了潜在情绪感染意义上的替代性情绪体验。在一个为期20节治疗课程中,随机选取三个疗程,对患有重度抑郁症的患者的情绪表达进行评分。虽然CT组患者和FEP组患者通常体验到的情绪类型没有显著差异,但在积极参与组和观察组成员的亚组中发现了差异。这表明各自疗法所做的过程假设仅对积极参与的患者有效,而对观察组成员无效。作为一个过程的情绪感染未得到支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验