Suppr超能文献

单次术前双功超声扫描对于双侧颈动脉内膜切除术的手术规划是否足够?

Is a single preoperative duplex scan sufficient for planning bilateral carotid endarterectomy?

作者信息

Abou-Zamzam A M, Moneta G L, Edwards J M, Yeager R A, Taylor L M, Porter J M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR 97201, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2000 Feb;31(2):282-8. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(00)90159-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Duplex scanning is often the sole imaging study before carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Patients with bilateral severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis may be considered for bilateral CEA. High-grade ICA stenosis, however, may artifactually elevate velocity measurements used to quantify stenosis in the contralateral ICA. It is unknown whether ipsilateral CEA will influence duplex determination of the presence of a contralateral 60% to 99% ICA stenosis. This study was performed to determine whether a single preoperative duplex scan is sufficient to plan bilateral CEA.

METHODS

Preoperative and early postoperative carotid duplex scans in patients with bilateral ICA stenosis who underwent unilateral CEA were reviewed. Changes in duplex scans that determined stenosis in the ICA contralateral to the CEA were analyzed. Previously validated criteria used to determine 60% to 99% ICA stenosis were a peak systolic velocity (PSV) of 260 cm/sec or more combined with an end diastolic velocity (EDV) of 70 cm/sec or more.

RESULTS

Over an 8-year period, 460 patients underwent CEA; 107 patients (23.3%) had an asymptomatic 50% to 99% contralateral ICA stenosis by standard criteria (PSV, >125 cm/sec) and an early postoperative duplex scan examination. Of these 107 patients, 38 patients (35.5%) had duplex scan criteria for 60% to 99% contralateral ICA stenosis. In these 38 patients, there was a mean postoperative PSV decrease of 47.7 cm/sec (10.1%) and a mean EDV decrease of 36.0 cm/sec (19.3%) in the ICA contralateral to the CEA. Eight of 38 (21.1%) preoperative contralateral 60% to 99% ICA lesions were reclassified as less than 60% on postoperative duplex scanning. Six of 69 (8.7%) preoperative lesions of less than 60% were reclassified as 60% to 99% on postoperative duplex scan. These six preoperative examinations were all close to the criteria for 60% to 99% stenosis (mean PSV, 232.5 cm/sec; mean EDV, 62.5 cm/sec).

CONCLUSION

One-fifth of patients with apparent 60% to 99% contralateral ICA lesions before the operation have less than 60% stenosis when restudied with duplex scan after unilateral CEA. Lesions below but near the cutoff for 60% to 99% may be reclassified as 60% to 99% on the postoperative duplex scan. These findings mandate that when duplex scanning is used as the sole imaging modality before CEA, patients with severe bilateral carotid stenosis must have an additional carotid duplex examination before operation on the second side.

摘要

目的

在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)前,双功超声扫描常常是唯一的影像学检查。双侧颈内动脉(ICA)严重狭窄的患者可考虑行双侧CEA。然而,高度ICA狭窄可能会人为地提高用于量化对侧ICA狭窄的速度测量值。同侧CEA是否会影响双功超声对侧60%至99%ICA狭窄的判定尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定术前单次双功超声扫描是否足以规划双侧CEA。

方法

回顾了接受单侧CEA的双侧ICA狭窄患者的术前和术后早期颈动脉双功超声扫描。分析了确定CEA对侧ICA狭窄的双功超声扫描变化。用于确定60%至99%ICA狭窄的先前验证标准为收缩期峰值速度(PSV)260cm/秒或更高,同时舒张期末速度(EDV)70cm/秒或更高。

结果

在8年期间,460例患者接受了CEA;107例患者(23.3%)根据标准标准(PSV>125cm/秒)和术后早期双功超声扫描检查,对侧ICA有50%至99%的无症状狭窄。在这107例患者中,38例(35.5%)双功超声扫描符合对侧ICA狭窄60%至99%的标准。在这38例患者中,CEA对侧ICA的术后PSV平均降低47.7cm/秒(10.1%),EDV平均降低36.0cm/秒(19.3%)。38例术前对侧60%至99%ICA病变中有8例(21.1%)在术后双功超声扫描中重新分类为小于60%。69例术前小于60%的病变中有6例(8.7%)在术后双功超声扫描中重新分类为60%至99%。这6次术前检查均接近60%至99%狭窄的标准(平均PSV为232.5cm/秒;平均EDV为62.5cm/秒)。

结论

术前对侧ICA病变明显为60%至99%的患者中,五分之一在单侧CEA后用双功超声复查时狭窄小于60%。低于但接近60%至99%临界值的病变在术后双功超声扫描中可能会重新分类为60%至99%。这些发现表明,当双功超声扫描作为CEA前唯一的影像学检查方法时,严重双侧颈动脉狭窄的患者在进行第二侧手术前必须进行额外的颈动脉双功超声检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验