Achike F I, Ogle C W
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Feb;40(2):177-83. doi: 10.1177/00912700022008838.
Medical students are usually drawn from the best of students, but it is not unusual to see these brilliant students fail their exams or even dismissed from medical school because of poor academic performance. Information overload has been recognized as one of the major contributing factors to this problem. The situation is expected to get worse, with the ever-present technology-induced exponential growth in information. In discussing this issue, the authors echo the concerns of several experts regarding the content overload of medical school curricula, particularly in pharmacology. It is the increasing awareness of this problem that led the Association of American Medical Colleges and the General Medical Council of Britain to promote the concept of a core curriculum for each of the principal disciplines in medicine. Several medical schools have adopted the concept and also the problem-based learning approach, which focuses on ameliorating the complex problems associated with information growth in medical education. Based on the authors' experience as medical students, medical practitioners, and pharmacology teachers, they discuss the factors that contribute to information overload, from psychological and nonpsychological perspectives. Issues such as the design and structure of the curriculum, the quality of training and effectiveness of the teachers (clinically qualified vs. nonclinically qualified teachers), and the psychological preparedness of the students are discussed. The authors make suggestions for improvement.
医学生通常是从最优秀的学生中选拔出来的,但经常会看到这些聪明的学生考试不及格,甚至由于学业成绩不佳而被医学院开除。信息过载已被认为是导致这一问题的主要因素之一。随着技术引发的信息呈指数级增长且这种情况一直存在,预计形势会变得更糟。在讨论这个问题时,作者们呼应了几位专家对医学院课程内容过载的担忧,尤其是在药理学方面。正是对这个问题的日益关注,促使美国医学院协会和英国医学总会推广医学各主要学科核心课程的概念。几所医学院已经采用了这一概念以及基于问题的学习方法,该方法侧重于改善医学教育中与信息增长相关的复杂问题。基于作者作为医学生、执业医生和药理学教师的经验,他们从心理和非心理角度讨论了导致信息过载的因素。还讨论了诸如课程的设计和结构、培训质量以及教师(临床合格教师与非临床合格教师)的有效性,以及学生的心理准备等问题。作者们提出了改进建议。