Abstract
The believability of a message is grounded in almost everything except the content of the message--there is no self-warranted truth. Credibility is based on the believer's assessment of the form of the message, its source, and especially by triangulation with a reference point. The most common group of reference points are compatibility, authority, collegiality, and performance.
摘要
相似文献
1
Credibility.
J Am Coll Dent. 1999 Winter;66(4):36-41.
2
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry publication standards of ethical conduct.
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Apr;93(4):311-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.01.001.
3
[Crisis of the scientific communication].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Sep 8;165(37):3514-8.
4
Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2008;22(4):219-21.
5
Resources for editors and editorial board members.
Nurse Author Ed. 2005 Spring;15(2):1-3.
6
Manuscript revision strategies.
West J Nurs Res. 2007 Nov;29(7):786-8. doi: 10.1177/0193945907305913.
7
Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
Can J Nurs Res. 2006 Dec;38(4):5-9.
8
CDA Code of Ethics.
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2004 Jan;32(1):71-7.
9
Talking back to reviewers: the gentle art of resubmission.
J Prof Nurs. 2001 Nov-Dec;17(6):276. doi: 10.1053/jpnu.2001.28999.
10
Dentistry and peer review: sham, smoke screen or reality.
J Am Coll Dent. 1976 Jul;43(3):164-75, 185.
Zotero 插件