Coulet F, Blons H, Cabelguenne A, Lecomte T, Lacourreye O, Brasnu D, Beaune P, Zucman J, Laurent-Puig P
Laboratoire de Toxicologie Moléculaire, U490 INSERM, Université René Descartes, Paris, France.
Cancer Res. 2000 Feb 1;60(3):707-11.
Recent arguments have suggested that tumor DNA in cancer patients could be found in plasma, but different points remain unclear. Using a series of 117 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors, our goals for this study were: (a) to quantify the amount of plasma DNA; (b) to evaluate the presence of plasma tumor DNA; and (c) to analyze the clinical relevance of tests based on plasma DNA analyses. Low levels of plasma DNA were found in most samples, but all were successfully amplified. Two different methods were used to detect tumor-specific genetic alterations: (a) microsatellite instability at UT5085 with an established sensitivity of 1:500; and (b) p53 mutation screening. Of the 117 tumors typed at UT5085, 65 demonstrated bandshifts (55%). Plasma and tumor DNA a showed similar alteration in only one case among these samples, and the prevalence of tumor DNA in plasma was estimated to be <2% using microsatellite analysis. Tumor DNA was detected in plasma at a higher prevalence (2 of 11 cases) when using p53 mutant allele-specific amplification. These results showed that in plasma, tumor DNA is largely diluted by normal DNA. By comparison with previously published studies, the prevalence of microsatellite alterations in plasma in this series of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas is very low, despite the fact that a large series of tumors was analyzed. To explain this discrepancy, we analyzed the possibility of PCR artifacts as suspected by the presence of loss of heterozygosity in two plasma DNA samples without a similar tumor DNA alteration. When DNA concentrations were under the threshold of detection (<100 ng/ml), we demonstrated that PCR artifacts could occur at random, and, if misinterpreted, these false genetic alterations could artificially enhance the frequency of plasma DNA alterations. This may have been suspected in previously published series, but it has never been discussed before. Microsatellite analysis on plasma DNA is difficult to interpret and can frequently be misleading. Plasma DNA should be analyzed with very sensitive and specific methods such as mutant allele-specific amplification, which excludes artifacts but requires specific optimization that is probably not compatible with routine and clinical use.
最近有观点认为,癌症患者血浆中可发现肿瘤DNA,但仍有一些问题尚不清楚。我们使用117例头颈部鳞状细胞癌肿瘤样本进行本研究,目的如下:(a)定量血浆DNA含量;(b)评估血浆肿瘤DNA的存在情况;(c)分析基于血浆DNA分析的检测方法的临床相关性。多数样本中血浆DNA水平较低,但均成功扩增。我们采用两种不同方法检测肿瘤特异性基因改变:(a)UT5085处的微卫星不稳定性,已知灵敏度为1:500;(b)p53突变筛查。在UT5085分型的117例肿瘤中,65例出现条带移位(55%)。在这些样本中,仅1例血浆和肿瘤DNA显示相似改变,通过微卫星分析估计血浆中肿瘤DNA的发生率<2%。使用p53突变等位基因特异性扩增时,血浆中肿瘤DNA的检出率更高(11例中有2例)。这些结果表明,血浆中的肿瘤DNA在很大程度上被正常DNA稀释。与先前发表的研究相比,尽管分析了大量肿瘤样本,但本系列头颈部鳞状细胞癌血浆中微卫星改变的发生率非常低。为解释这一差异,我们分析了两个血浆DNA样本中存在杂合性缺失(而肿瘤DNA无类似改变)时疑似的PCR假象的可能性。当DNA浓度低于检测阈值(<100 ng/ml)时,我们证明PCR假象可能随机出现,若解读错误,这些假基因改变可能人为提高血浆DNA改变的频率。这在先前发表的系列研究中可能已被怀疑,但此前从未被讨论过。血浆DNA的微卫星分析难以解读,且常具误导性。血浆DNA应采用非常灵敏和特异的方法进行分析,如突变等位基因特异性扩增,该方法可排除假象,但需要特定优化,可能与常规临床应用不兼容。