Wang T, Cheng H H, Heimbürger O, Bergström J, Lindholm B
Division of Baxter Novum, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden.
Adv Perit Dial. 1999;15:21-7.
Polyglucose (PG) solution has been shown to be capable of inducing peritoneal ultrafiltration despite its hypo-osmolality. However, the mechanism of osmosis by PG is not clear. In this study, we compared the fluid kinetics of albumin (ALB) solution (thought to be an ideal solution that should induce ultrafiltration through colloid osmosis) and PG solution. A 4-hour dwell study with frequent sampling was conducted in Sprague-Dawley rats (six rats in each group). The study used 25 mL of dialysate buffer, 10% ALB dialysis solution, 15% ALB dialysis solution, 20% ALB dialysis solution, or 7.5% PG solution, with 131I albumin as an intraperitoneal volume marker. All solutions were prepared by adding ALB or PG to a base dialysis solution (without osmotic agent). The initial osmolality values of the five solutions were 250 mOsm/kg, 284 mOsm/kg, 300 mOsm/kg, 320 mOsm/kg, and 280 mOsm/kg, and the dialysate drainage volumes at 4 hours were 17.0 +/- 0.8 mL, 22.4 +/- 0.8 mL, 25.4 +/- 0.6 mL, 27.3 +/- 0.9 mL, and 26.3 +/- 0.6 mL (buffer, 10% ALB, 15% ALB, 20% ALB, and 7.5% PG groups, respectively). The higher initial osmolality in the ALB groups was partially due to the sodium content in the ALB powder. The intraperitoneal volume was decreasing in the 10% ALB group, rather stable in the 15% ALB group, but slowly increasing in the 20% ALB group. In the PG group, intraperitoneal volume decreased initially and then started to increase after 2 hours. This pattern was closely related to the increase in the dialysate osmolality (to higher than plasma level). At 4 hours, the dialysate osmolality was significantly higher (and higher than plasma level) in the PG group as compared to all the ALB groups. No differences in peritoneal fluid absorption rate were observed among the four treatment groups. In the 15% ALB and 20% ALB groups, the transcapillary ultrafiltration rate (Qu) was lower in the later part of the dwell than in the initial part of the dwell; in the PG group, the opposite pattern was observed. Our results suggest that the osmosis of albumin dialysis solution is different from the osmosis of polyglucose solution. Polyglucose solution induces net ultrafiltration only when the dialysate osmolality increase to higher than plasma level, suggesting that degradation of polyglucose may be important for effective ultrafiltration.
尽管聚葡萄糖(PG)溶液为低渗溶液,但已证明其能够诱导腹膜超滤。然而,PG的渗透机制尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们比较了白蛋白(ALB)溶液(被认为是一种应通过胶体渗透诱导超滤的理想溶液)和PG溶液的液体动力学。在Sprague-Dawley大鼠中进行了一项为期4小时的驻留研究,并频繁采样(每组6只大鼠)。该研究使用了25 mL透析液缓冲液、10% ALB透析液、15% ALB透析液、20% ALB透析液或7.5% PG溶液,并以131I白蛋白作为腹腔内体积标记物。所有溶液均通过向基础透析液(不含渗透剂)中添加ALB或PG来制备。五种溶液的初始渗透压值分别为250 mOsm/kg、284 mOsm/kg、300 mOsm/kg、320 mOsm/kg和280 mOsm/kg,4小时时的透析液排出量分别为17.0±0.8 mL、22.4±0.8 mL、25.4±0.6 mL、27.3±0.9 mL和26.3±0.6 mL(分别为缓冲液组、10% ALB组、15% ALB组、20% ALB组和7.5% PG组)。ALB组较高的初始渗透压部分归因于ALB粉末中的钠含量。10% ALB组的腹腔内体积在减少,15% ALB组相对稳定,但20% ALB组在缓慢增加。在PG组中,腹腔内体积最初减少,2小时后开始增加。这种模式与透析液渗透压的增加(高于血浆水平)密切相关。在4小时时,与所有ALB组相比,PG组的透析液渗透压显著更高(且高于血浆水平)。四个治疗组之间未观察到腹膜液吸收率的差异。在15% ALB组和20% ALB组中,跨毛细血管超滤率(Qu)在驻留后期低于驻留初期;而在PG组中观察到相反的模式。我们的结果表明,白蛋白透析液的渗透与聚葡萄糖溶液的渗透不同。聚葡萄糖溶液仅在透析液渗透压增加到高于血浆水平时才诱导净超滤,这表明聚葡萄糖的降解对于有效的超滤可能很重要。