Shalev J, Meizner I, Bar-Hava I, Dicker D, Mashiach R, Ben-Rafael Z
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Fertil Steril. 2000 Feb;73(2):412-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00533-6.
To compare transvaginal sonography with hysteroscopy for the evaluation of intrauterine disorders.
Clinical study.
Academic research environment.
PATIENT(S): Patients who were undergoing initial evaluation for primary or secondary infertility or investigation after three failed IVF attempts.
INTERVENTION(S): Transvaginal sonography was performed, followed by hysteroscopy, between January 1998 and April 1999. The endometrial findings at sonography were compared with those at hysteroscopy, which served as the gold standard. The characteristic sonographic features of intrauterine adhesions were defined.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intrauterine adhesions, endometrial polyps.
RESULT(S): The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for transvaginal sonography in detecting abnormal uterine cavities were 100%, 96.3%, 91.3%, and 100%, respectively. The corresponding values for the specific diagnoses of intrauterine adhesions and endometrial polyps were 80%, 100%, 100%, and 97%, and 71.4%, 100%, 100%, and 97.1%, respectively. On transvaginal sonography, intrauterine adhesions appeared as hyperechoic endometrial foci and were differentiated from endometrial polyps by their irregular shape and more precise localization. The performance of transvaginal sonography at midcycle (three-layer endometrium) rather than after menstrual cessation (endometrial thickness <3 mm) enabled better imaging of small intrauterine adhesions.
CONCLUSION(S): A regular myometrial-endometrial interface and homogeneous endometrial structure on transvaginal sonography congruent with the phase of the menstrual cycle indicated a normal endometrium and precluded the need for diagnostic hysteroscopy. Transvaginal sonography may be used as the initial diagnostic procedure to select patients for hysteroscopy.
比较经阴道超声检查与宫腔镜检查在评估子宫内疾病方面的效果。
临床研究。
学术研究环境。
因原发性或继发性不孕症接受初次评估或在三次体外受精尝试失败后接受检查的患者。
在1998年1月至1999年4月期间,先进行经阴道超声检查,随后进行宫腔镜检查。将超声检查时的子宫内膜检查结果与作为金标准的宫腔镜检查结果进行比较。确定了子宫内粘连的特征性超声特征。
子宫内粘连、子宫内膜息肉。
经阴道超声检查在检测子宫腔异常方面的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100%、96.3%、91.3%和100%。子宫内粘连和子宫内膜息肉的具体诊断的相应值分别为80%、100%、100%和97%,以及71.4%、100%、100%和97.1%。在经阴道超声检查中,子宫内粘连表现为高回声子宫内膜病灶,通过其不规则形状和更精确的定位与子宫内膜息肉相区分。在月经周期中期(三层子宫内膜)而非月经停止后(子宫内膜厚度<3mm)进行经阴道超声检查,能够更好地显示小的子宫内粘连。
经阴道超声检查显示的规则的肌层-子宫内膜界面和与月经周期阶段一致的均匀子宫内膜结构表明子宫内膜正常,无需进行诊断性宫腔镜检查。经阴道超声检查可作为选择进行宫腔镜检查患者的初始诊断方法。