Suppr超能文献

UroLume内支架移除术:北美逼尿肌-括约肌协同失调应用研究组的经验

Removal of UroLume endoprosthesis: experience of the North American Study Group for detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia application.

作者信息

Gajewski J B, Chancellor M B, Ackman C F, Appell R A, Bennett J, Binard J, Boone T B, Chetner M P, Crewalk J A, Defalco A, Foote J, Green B, Juma S, Jung S Y, Linsenmeyer T A, Macaluso J N, Macmillan R, Mayo M, Ozawa H, Roehrborn C G, Schmidt J, Shenot P J, Stone A, Vazquez A, Killorin W, Rivas D A

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):773-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67801-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We present the experience of the North American UroLume Multicenter Study Group with removal of the UroLume endoprosthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 160 neurologically impaired patients were enrolled in the North American UroLume Multicenter Study Group for detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia application. Analysis was performed in 2 groups of patients in which the device was removed during insertion and after implantation, respectively.

RESULTS

Device retrieval was required during insertion in 21 patients (13%) mainly due to misplacement or migration in 17. Extraction was done with minimal complications and in all but 2 cases subsequent UroLume implantation was successful. Of 158 men with the device in place 31 (19.6%) required removal. In 34 procedures 44 devices were removed, mainly due to migration. Time from implantation to removal ranged from 4 days to 66 months (mean 22 months). The UroLume was removed en bloc in 20 cases and in parts or wire by wire in 19. The majority of patients had no or minimal complications after extraction. Only 2 patients had serious temporary complications, including bleeding and urethral injury, with no lasting consequences. No malignancy developed as a result of UroLume insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

While there is a potential for urethral injury and bleeding, UroLume endoprosthesis removal is largely a simple procedure with minimal complications and consequences.

摘要

目的

我们介绍北美UroLume多中心研究组取出UroLume内假体的经验。

材料与方法

共有160例神经功能受损患者纳入北美UroLume多中心研究组,用于逼尿肌外括约肌协同失调的治疗。分别对两组患者进行分析,一组在装置插入过程中取出,另一组在植入后取出。

结果

21例患者(13%)在插入过程中需要取出装置,主要原因是17例出现位置不当或移位。取出过程并发症极少,除2例以外,所有患者随后的UroLume植入均成功。在158例植入该装置的男性患者中,31例(19.6%)需要取出。在34次手术中取出了44个装置,主要原因是移位。从植入到取出的时间为4天至66个月(平均22个月)。20例患者整块取出UroLume,19例患者逐部分或逐根导线取出。大多数患者取出后无并发症或并发症极少。只有2例患者出现严重的暂时性并发症,包括出血和尿道损伤,但无持久后果。未因插入UroLume而发生恶性肿瘤。

结论

虽然存在尿道损伤和出血的可能性,但取出UroLume内假体在很大程度上是一个简单的手术,并发症和后果极少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验