Ma D Q, Rajewski R A, Vander Velde D, Stella V J
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, USA.
J Pharm Sci. 2000 Feb;89(2):275-87. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6017(200002)89:2<275::AID-JPS15>3.0.CO;2-C.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the potential use of two parenterally safe beta-cyclodextrins derivatives, (SBE)7m-beta-CD and HP-beta-CD, as solubilizers and stabilizers for melphalan and carmustine, two very unstable antineoplastic agents. Phase solubility and chemical stability of the compounds in the presence of the cyclodextrins were studied. UV, fluorescence, and several NMR techniques were used to probe the potential causes for the differences observed. The phase solubility method was found to provide only qualitative data on the binding of melphalan to the cyclodextrins since rapid degradation and the presence of products of degradation complicated the interpretation of the results. Qualitatively, however, the solubilizing potential was similar for the two cyclodextrins. The chemical stability studies indicate that both of the drugs had similar binding constants for both cyclodextrins; however, the intrinsic reactivities in the complexes were significantly lower with (SBE)7m-beta-CD than for HP-beta-CD. The main cause for this distinct difference appeared to correlate with differences in the site of binding and the polarity of the binding site.
本研究的目的是评估和比较两种肠胃外安全的β-环糊精衍生物,即(SBE)7m-β-CD和HP-β-CD,作为两种极不稳定的抗肿瘤药物美法仑和卡莫司汀的增溶剂和稳定剂的潜在用途。研究了环糊精存在下化合物的相溶解度和化学稳定性。使用紫外、荧光和几种核磁共振技术来探究观察到差异的潜在原因。发现相溶解度法仅提供了关于美法仑与环糊精结合的定性数据,因为快速降解和降解产物的存在使结果的解释变得复杂。然而,定性地说,两种环糊精的增溶潜力相似。化学稳定性研究表明,两种药物与两种环糊精的结合常数相似;然而,(SBE)7m-β-CD与HP-β-CD相比,复合物中的固有反应性显著降低。这种明显差异的主要原因似乎与结合位点和结合位点极性的差异有关。