Ackerman S J, Clemence A J, Weatherill R, Hilsenroth M J
Department of Psychology, University of Arkansas, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1999 Dec;73(3):422-48. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7303_9.
The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS), developed by Western, Lohr, Silk, Kerber, and Goodrich (1985), is a diagnostic instrument used to assess an array of psychological functioning by using clinical narratives such as the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT; Murray, 1943) stories. This study investigated the utility of the SCORS to differentiate between Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. [DSM-IV]; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) antisocial personality disorder (ANPD), borderline personality disorder (BPD), narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), and Cluster C personality disorder (CPD). A sample of 58 patients was separated into four groups: ANPD (n = 9), BPD (n = 21; 18 with a primary BPD diagnosis and 3 with prominent borderline traits who met 4 of the 5 DSM-IV criteria necessary for a BPD diagnosis), NPD (n = 16; 8 with a primary NPD diagnosis and 8 with prominent narcissistic traits who met 4 of the 5 DSM-IV criteria necessary for a NPD diagnosis), and CPD (n = 12). These groups were then compared on the 8 SCORS variables by using 5 TAT cards (1, 2, 3BM, 4, and 13MF). Spearman-Brown correction for 2-way mixed effects model of reliability for the 8 SCORS variables ranged from .70 to .95. The results of categorical and dimensional analyses indicate that (a) SCORS variables can be used to differentiate ANPD, BPD, and NPD; (b) the BPD group scored significantly lower (greater maladjustment) than did the CPD group on certain variables; (c) the BPD group scored significantly lower (greater maladjustment) than did the NPD group on all 8 SCORS variables; (d) the ANPD group scored significantly lower than did the NPD group on certain variables; (e) certain variables were found to be empirically related to the total number of DSM-IV ANPD, BPD, and NPD criteria; and (f) certain variables were found to be empirically related to Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2; Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) Personality disorder scales. The results of this study are discussed in terms of clinical utility, conceptual, and theoretical implications.
社会认知与客体关系量表(SCORS)由韦斯顿、洛尔、西尔克、克伯和古德里奇于1985年编制,是一种诊断工具,通过使用诸如主题统觉测验(TAT;默里,1943)故事等临床叙述来评估一系列心理功能。本研究调查了SCORS在区分《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第4版[DSM-IV];美国精神病学协会,1994)中的反社会型人格障碍(ANPD)、边缘型人格障碍(BPD)、自恋型人格障碍(NPD)和C类人格障碍(CPD)方面的效用。58名患者的样本被分为四组:ANPD组(n = 9)、BPD组(n = 21;18名主要诊断为BPD,3名具有突出边缘特征且符合BPD诊断所需的5条DSM-IV标准中的4条)、NPD组(n = 16;8名主要诊断为NPD,8名具有突出自恋特征且符合NPD诊断所需的5条DSM-IV标准中的4条)和CPD组(n = 12)。然后使用5张TAT卡片(1、2、3BM、4和13MF)对这四组在8个SCORS变量上进行比较。8个SCORS变量的双向混合效应模型的斯皮尔曼-布朗信度校正范围为0.70至0.95。分类分析和维度分析结果表明:(a)SCORS变量可用于区分ANPD、BPD和NPD;(b)在某些变量上,BPD组的得分显著低于CPD组(适应不良程度更高);(c)在所有8个SCORS变量上,BPD组的得分显著低于NPD组(适应不良程度更高);(d)在某些变量上,ANPD组的得分显著低于NPD组;(e)发现某些变量与DSM-IV中ANPD、BPD和NPD标准的总数存在实证关系;(f)发现某些变量与明尼苏达多相人格调查表-2(MMPI-2;布彻、达尔斯特伦、格雷厄姆、泰勒根和凯默,1989)人格障碍量表存在实证关系。本研究结果从临床效用、概念和理论意义等方面进行了讨论。