Suppr超能文献

儿童诊断性成像研究中镇静的恢复时间延长及副作用延迟出现。

Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children.

作者信息

Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Prochaska G, Tait A R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2000 Mar;105(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.3.e42.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although sedation-related adverse events in children in the hospital setting have been extensively reported, limited data are available regarding adverse events after discharge home. Despite nationally recommended discharge criteria, in busy outpatient settings, children may be sent home into the care of their parents after a brief recovery from sedation, placing them at risk for adverse events in an unmonitored setting. Previous studies have not addressed issues such as requirement for escalation of care after discharge (ie, emergency department visits or hospitalization), or parental satisfaction with their child's sedation experience. This study was undertaken to evaluate the recovery and delayed adverse events after discharge of children who received sedation for magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography.

METHODS

With approval from the institutional review board and written informed consent from a parent, children (<18 years old) sedated for magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography were studied. Sedative drugs were ordered at the discretion of the radiologist responsible for the procedure in accordance with institutional sedation guidelines and in consideration of the child's health status. Pediatric nurses in the diagnostic areas administered the sedative agent(s) and monitored children according to preestablished institutional guidelines. Demographics, sedative(s) administered, and adverse events including hypoxemia (decrease in SpO(2) by >/=10% of baseline) and sedation events such as inadequate, failed, or excessive sedation, were documented on the institutional quality assurance tool. Children were discharged from the hospital when they met the following preestablished discharge criteria: return to baseline vital signs, level of consciousness close to baseline, and the ability to maintain a patent airway. The following day, parents were telephoned and questioned regarding the child's alertness, side effects, and whether medical follow-up had been sought. Parents also rated their overall satisfaction with the sedation experience.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy six children comprised the sample. Eighty nine percent of children received chloral hydrate (CH; 64 +/- 13 mg/kg), and 11% midazolam (.15 +/-.13 mg/kg) as the primary sedative. There was an 8% incidence of failed sedation, and a 1.6% incidence of hypoxemia during the procedure. Three children required prolonged monitoring in the postanesthesia care unit before discharge; 1 child attributable to an allergic reaction, a second attributable to wheezing and oxygen desaturation, and the third attributable to prolonged sedation from CH and midazolam. These children were discharged home from the postanesthesia care unit without additional sequelae. Side effects after discharge included: motor imbalance (31%), gastrointestinal effects (23%), agitation (19%), and restlessness (14%). Agitation and restlessness lasted greater than 6 hours in more than one third of children who experienced these effects. CH was more commonly associated with imbalance compared with midazolam, and restlessness and prolonged imbalance were associated with younger age. Medical advice was sought after discharge for 15 (4%) children, 3 of whom required a visit to the emergency department for excessive or prolonged sedation. Each of these children had received CH as a sole sedative in recommended doses (61-77 mg/kg). In 1 of these cases, the procedure had been aborted because of inadequate sedation in the hospital, yet the child became difficult to arouse at home. Only 48% of children returned to baseline activity and behavior within 8 hours of the procedure; however, 89% were back to baseline status within 24 hours. Notably, 5% of all children did not return to baseline activity until the second day after the procedure. Although not statistically significant, infants <12 months old experienced delayed recovery (ie, >/=24 hours) more frequently compared with older c

摘要

目的

尽管医院环境中儿童镇静相关不良事件已有大量报道,但出院后不良事件的数据有限。尽管有国家推荐的出院标准,但在繁忙的门诊环境中,儿童在从镇静中短暂恢复后可能被送回家由父母照顾,这使他们在无人监测的环境中面临不良事件风险。以往研究未涉及出院后护理升级需求(如急诊就诊或住院)或父母对孩子镇静体验的满意度等问题。本研究旨在评估接受磁共振成像或计算机断层扫描镇静的儿童出院后的恢复情况及延迟不良事件。

方法

经机构审查委员会批准并获得家长书面知情同意后,对接受磁共振成像或计算机断层扫描镇静的18岁以下儿童进行研究。镇静药物由负责该检查的放射科医生根据机构镇静指南并考虑儿童健康状况酌情开具。诊断区域的儿科护士给予镇静剂,并根据既定的机构指南对儿童进行监测。人口统计学资料、使用的镇静剂以及不良事件,包括低氧血症(SpO₂较基线下降≥10%)和镇静事件,如镇静不足、失败或过度镇静,均记录在机构质量保证工具上。当儿童符合以下既定出院标准时可出院:生命体征恢复至基线、意识水平接近基线、能够维持气道通畅。次日,给家长打电话询问孩子的清醒程度、副作用以及是否寻求了医疗随访。家长还对他们对镇静体验的总体满意度进行评分。

结果

376名儿童构成样本。89%的儿童接受水合氯醛(CH;64±13mg/kg)作为主要镇静剂,11%接受咪达唑仑(0.15±0.13mg/kg)。镇静失败发生率为8%,检查过程中低氧血症发生率为1.6%。3名儿童在出院前需要在麻醉后护理单元延长监测时间;1名儿童因过敏反应,第二名因喘息和氧饱和度下降,第三名因CH和咪达唑仑导致的镇静时间延长。这些儿童从麻醉后护理单元出院时无其他后遗症。出院后的副作用包括:运动失调(31%)、胃肠道影响(23%)、烦躁(19%)和不安(14%)。超过三分之一出现这些影响的儿童中,烦躁和不安持续超过6小时。与咪达唑仑相比,CH更常与失调相关,不安和持续失调与年龄较小有关。15名(4%)儿童出院后寻求了医疗建议,其中3名因镇静过度或时间延长而需要到急诊科就诊。这些儿童均接受了推荐剂量(61 - 77mg/kg)的CH作为唯一镇静剂。在其中1例中,因医院内镇静不足手术中止,但孩子在家中变得难以唤醒。只有48%的儿童在检查后8小时内恢复到基线活动和行为;然而,89%在24小时内恢复到基线状态。值得注意的是,所有儿童中有5%直到检查后第二天才恢复到基线活动。虽然无统计学意义,但12个月以下婴儿与较大儿童相比,恢复延迟(即≥24小时)的情况更频繁。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验