Suppr超能文献

五名在利多卡因蛛网膜下腔麻醉后出现短暂神经症状的志愿者的脊神经功能

Spinal nerve function in five volunteers experiencing transient neurologic symptoms after lidocaine subarachnoid anesthesia.

作者信息

Pollock J E, Burkhead D, Neal J M, Liu S S, Friedman A, Stephenson C, Polissar N L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center. University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98111, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2000 Mar;90(3):658-65. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00028.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The etiology of transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) after 5% lidocaine spinal anesthesia remains undetermined. Previous case reports have shown that patients acutely experiencing TNS have no abnormalities on neurologic examination or magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of our study was to determine whether volunteers with TNS would exhibit abnormalities in spinal nerve electrophysiology. Twelve volunteers with no history of back pain or neurologic disease underwent baseline electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction studies, and somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) testing. Then, the volunteers were administered 50 mg of 5% hyperbaric lidocaine spinal anesthesia and were placed in a low lithotomy position (legs on four pillows). The next day, all volunteers underwent follow-up EMG, nerve conduction, and SSEP testing and were questioned and examined for the presence of complications including TNS (defined as pain or dysthesia in one or both buttocks or legs occurring within 24 h of spinal anesthesia). Volunteers who had TNS underwent additional EMG testing 4-6 wk later. Five of the 12 volunteers reported TNS. No volunteer had an abnormal EMG, nerve conduction study, or SSEP at 24 h follow up, nor were there any changes in EMG studies at delayed testing in the five volunteers experiencing TNS. On statistical analysis, the right peroneal and the right tibial nerve differed significantly for all volunteers from pre- to postspinal testing. When comparing pre- and postspinal testing of the TNS and non-TNS volunteers, statistically significant changes occurred in the nerve conduction tests of the right peroneal and left tibial nerve. There was no difference in measurements of F response, H reflex latency, amplitude, or velocity for either leg. Multivariate analysis of variance showed no significant difference between TNS and non-TNS volunteers for the changes in the nine nerve conduction tests when considered together (P = 0.4). We conclude that acute TNS after lidocaine spinal anesthesia did not result in consistent abnormalities detectable by EMG, nerve conduction studies, or SSEP in five volunteers.

IMPLICATIONS

Electrophysiologic testing in volunteers experiencing transient neurologic symptoms is not abnormal.

摘要

未标注

5%利多卡因脊髓麻醉后短暂性神经症状(TNS)的病因仍未明确。既往病例报告显示,急性发作TNS的患者在神经学检查或磁共振成像上无异常。我们研究的目的是确定患有TNS的志愿者在脊神经电生理方面是否会出现异常。12名无背痛或神经疾病史的志愿者接受了基线肌电图(EMG)、神经传导研究和体感诱发电位(SSEP)测试。然后,给志愿者们给予50mg 5%的高压利多卡因脊髓麻醉,并使其处于低位截石位(双腿置于四个枕头上)。第二天,所有志愿者接受了随访EMG、神经传导和SSEP测试,并被询问和检查是否存在包括TNS在内的并发症(定义为脊髓麻醉后24小时内一侧或双侧臀部或腿部出现疼痛或感觉异常)。出现TNS的志愿者在4 - 6周后接受了额外的EMG测试。12名志愿者中有5名报告出现了TNS。在24小时随访时,没有志愿者的EMG、神经传导研究或SSEP异常,在5名出现TNS的志愿者的延迟测试中,EMG研究也没有任何变化。经统计分析,所有志愿者从脊髓麻醉前到脊髓麻醉后的测试中,右侧腓总神经和右侧胫神经有显著差异。在比较出现TNS和未出现TNS的志愿者脊髓麻醉前后的测试时,右侧腓总神经和左侧胫神经的神经传导测试出现了统计学上的显著变化。双腿的F波反应、H反射潜伏期、波幅或速度测量值没有差异。多因素方差分析显示,当综合考虑9项神经传导测试的变化时,出现TNS和未出现TNS的志愿者之间没有显著差异(P = 0.4)。我们得出结论,利多卡因脊髓麻醉后的急性TNS在5名志愿者中并未导致EMG、神经传导研究或SSEP可检测到的一致异常。

启示

出现短暂性神经症状的志愿者的电生理测试无异常。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验