Lee C W, Park S W, Cho G Y, Hong M K, Kim J J, Kang D H, Song J K, Lee H J, Park S J
Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Mar 15;35(4):949-55. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00649-x.
We evaluated the relation between pressure-derived fractional collateral flow (PDCF) and left ventricular (LV) recovery after reperfused acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
The functional significance of collateral flow remains uncertain in AMI.
The PDCF was measured in 70 patients with first AMI (pain onset <12 h) treated with primary angioplasty (PA), being determined by simultaneous measurement of mean aorta pressure (Pa), distal coronary pressure during the balloon occlusion (Poc), and central venous pressure (CVP): (Poc - CVP)/(Pa - CVP)*100. Sufficient collateral (group I) was defined as PDCF index >24% and insufficient collateral (group II) as PDCF index <24%. Echocardiography was performed before, and on day 3, day 7, and day 30 after PA. Wall-motion recovery index (RI) was obtained by dividing the number of improved wall-motion segments (>grade 1) at follow-up by the number of abnormal wall-motion segments within the infarct zone at baseline.
Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. Peak levels of creatine kinase were lower in group I than in group II (2,600+/-1,900 U/liter vs. 4,100+/-3,000, p < 0.05). At one month, infarct zone wall-motion score index (1.65+/-0.54 vs. 2.31+/-0.46, p < 0.01) and LV volume indexes were smaller in group I than in group II, whereas, LV ejection fraction was higher in group I than in group II (52.8+/-8.3 vs. 45.9+/-9.0, p < 0.01). The PDCF index was the strongest predictor of RI at one month (r = 0.61, p < 0.01). Time to reperfusion was not related to RI at one month. However, it was significantly related to RI in group II (r = -0.34, p < 0.05).
The LV recovery after reperfused AMI is primarily determined by PDCF and is less dependent on time to reperfusion in patients with sufficient collaterals.
我们评估了再灌注急性心肌梗死(AMI)后压力衍生的侧支血流分数(PDCF)与左心室(LV)恢复之间的关系。
侧支血流在AMI中的功能意义仍不确定。
对70例接受直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PA)治疗的首次AMI患者(疼痛发作<12小时)测量PDCF,通过同时测量平均主动脉压(Pa)、球囊闭塞时远端冠状动脉压力(Poc)和中心静脉压(CVP)来确定:(Poc - CVP)/(Pa - CVP)*100。侧支血流充足(I组)定义为PDCF指数>24%,侧支血流不足(II组)定义为PDCF指数<24%。在PA术前、术后第3天、第7天和第30天进行超声心动图检查。壁运动恢复指数(RI)通过随访时改善的壁运动节段数(>1级)除以基线时梗死区内异常壁运动节段数获得。
两组患者的基线特征相似。I组肌酸激酶峰值水平低于II组(2,600±1,900 U/升 vs. 4,100±3,000,p<0.05)。在1个月时,I组梗死区壁运动评分指数(1.65±0.54 vs. 2.31±0.46,p<0.01)和LV容积指数低于II组,而I组LV射血分数高于II组(52.8±8.3 vs. 45.9±9.0,p<0.01)。PDCF指数是1个月时RI的最强预测因子(r = 0.61,p<0.01)。再灌注时间与1个月时的RI无关。然而,它与II组的RI显著相关(r = -0.34,p<0.05)。
再灌注AMI后的LV恢复主要由PDCF决定,并且在侧支血流充足的患者中对再灌注时间的依赖性较小。