Suppr超能文献

描述椎旁肌肌电图检查结果:单一的0至4+评分的不足之处。

Describing paraspinal EMG findings: inadequacy of the single 0-4+ score.

作者信息

Haig A J, Levine J W, Ruan C, Yamakawa K

机构信息

Spine Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0042, USA.

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Mar-Apr;79(2):133-7. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200003000-00004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinical electrodiagnostic textbooks instruct that lumbar radiculopathies typically have paraspinal abnormalities and that these abnormalities should be recorded using a single 0-4+ scale. Recent work demonstrates that that the innervation of the paraspinal muscles is segmental, not homogenous, and that asymptomatic persons may have reproducible ("1+") positive waves or fibrillation potentials.

DESIGN

To assess current use of the 0-4+ scale, a retrospective study of EMG scores in persons diagnosed with radiculopathy at a university laboratory was performed. No specific paraspinal EMG technique was used. Included were 117 consecutive, qualified S-1 radiculopathies and 33 L-5 radiculopathies.

RESULTS

When radiculopathy was defined by "more than one limb muscle abnormal," paraspinal scores were recorded as 0 to 1+ in 83% of L-5 and 63% of S-1 cases (chi2, L-5 vs. S-1, not significant). For more severe radiculopathies (at least one limb muscle with a "2+" score), 0-1+ paraspinal scores were recorded in 76% of L-5 and 57% of S-1 cases (chi2, not significant). A total of 82% of S-1 radiculopathies with no overlapping L-5 innervation had 0-1+ scores.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate the common use of equivocal paraspinal scores in patients whom electromyographers believe have radiculopathies. Standardized exploration techniques and a more detailed scoring system for the paraspinal muscles may eliminate this discrepancy.

摘要

目的

临床电诊断学教科书指出,腰椎神经根病通常伴有椎旁异常,且这些异常情况应使用单一的0至4+分级量表进行记录。近期研究表明,椎旁肌的神经支配是节段性的,并非均匀分布,而且无症状者也可能出现可重复的(“1+”)正波或纤颤电位。

设计

为评估0至4+分级量表的当前使用情况,对一所大学实验室中被诊断为神经根病患者的肌电图评分进行了一项回顾性研究。未采用特定的椎旁肌电图技术。纳入了117例连续的、符合条件的S-1神经根病患者和33例L-5神经根病患者。

结果

当神经根病定义为“不止一块肢体肌肉异常”时,83%的L-5病例和63%的S-1病例的椎旁肌评分被记录为0至1+(卡方检验,L-5与S-1比较,差异无统计学意义)。对于更严重的神经根病(至少一块肢体肌肉评分为“2+”),76%的L-5病例和57%的S-1病例的椎旁肌评分被记录为0至1+(卡方检验,差异无统计学意义)。在无L-5神经支配重叠的S-1神经根病患者中,共有82%的患者评分为0至1+。

结论

这些数据表明,在肌电图检查人员认为患有神经根病的患者中,椎旁肌评分模棱两可的情况很常见。标准化的探查技术和更详细的椎旁肌评分系统可能会消除这种差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验