Fairlie D P, Tyndall J D, Reid R C, Wong A K, Abbenante G, Scanlon M J, March D R, Bergman D A, Chai C L, Burkett B A
Centre for Drug Design and Development, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
J Med Chem. 2000 Apr 6;43(7):1271-81. doi: 10.1021/jm990315t.
Inhibitors of proteolytic enzymes (proteases) are emerging as prospective treatments for diseases such as AIDS and viral infections, cancers, inflammatory disorders, and Alzheimer's disease. Generic approaches to the design of protease inhibitors are limited by the unpredictability of interactions between, and structural changes to, inhibitor and protease during binding. A computer analysis of superimposed crystal structures for 266 small molecule inhibitors bound to 48 proteases (16 aspartic, 17 serine, 8 cysteine, and 7 metallo) provides the first conclusive proof that inhibitors, including substrate analogues, commonly bind in an extended beta-strand conformation at the active sites of all these proteases. Representative superimposed structures are shown for (a) multiple inhibitors bound to a protease of each class, (b) single inhibitors each bound to multiple proteases, and (c) conformationally constrained inhibitors bound to proteases. Thus inhibitor/substrate conformation, rather than sequence/composition alone, influences protease recognition, and this has profound implications for inhibitor design. This conclusion is supported by NMR, CD, and binding studies for HIV-1 protease inhibitors/substrates which, when preorganized in an extended conformation, have significantly higher protease affinity. Recognition is dependent upon conformational equilibria since helical and turn peptide conformations are not processed by proteases. Conformational selection explains the resistance of folded/structured regions of proteins to proteolytic degradation, the susceptibility of denatured proteins to processing, and the higher affinity of conformationally constrained 'extended' inhibitors/substrates for proteases. Other approaches to extended inhibitor conformations should similarly lead to high-affinity binding to a protease.
蛋白水解酶(蛋白酶)抑制剂正逐渐成为治疗艾滋病、病毒感染、癌症、炎症性疾病和阿尔茨海默病等疾病的潜在疗法。蛋白酶抑制剂设计的通用方法受到抑制剂与蛋白酶结合过程中相互作用及结构变化不可预测性的限制。对与48种蛋白酶(16种天冬氨酸蛋白酶、17种丝氨酸蛋白酶、8种半胱氨酸蛋白酶和7种金属蛋白酶)结合的266种小分子抑制剂的叠加晶体结构进行计算机分析,首次确凿证明包括底物类似物在内的抑制剂通常以延伸的β-链构象结合在所有这些蛋白酶的活性位点上。展示了代表性的叠加结构,包括(a)与每类蛋白酶结合的多种抑制剂,(b)每种与多种蛋白酶结合的单一抑制剂,以及(c)与蛋白酶结合的构象受限抑制剂。因此,抑制剂/底物构象而非仅序列/组成影响蛋白酶识别,这对抑制剂设计具有深远意义。HIV-1蛋白酶抑制剂/底物的核磁共振(NMR)、圆二色性(CD)和结合研究支持了这一结论,当它们以延伸构象预先排列时,具有显著更高的蛋白酶亲和力。识别依赖于构象平衡,因为螺旋和转角肽构象不会被蛋白酶处理。构象选择解释了蛋白质折叠/结构化区域对蛋白水解降解的抗性、变性蛋白质对处理的敏感性以及构象受限的“延伸”抑制剂/底物对蛋白酶的更高亲和力。其他获得延伸抑制剂构象的方法同样应能导致与蛋白酶的高亲和力结合。