Rosner D
Program in the History of Public Health and Medicine, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2000 Apr;90(4):535-40. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.4.535.
During the past 2 decades, a growing number of manslaughter and even murder charges have been brought against employers in cases involving the death of workers on the job. In this commentary, the author reviews some of these recent cases and looks at other periods in American history when workers' deaths were considered a form of homicide. He examines the social forces that shape how we define a worker's death: as an accidental, chance occurrence for which no individual is responsible, or as a predictable result of gross indifference to human life for which management bears criminal responsibility. He asks whether there is a parallel between the conditions of 19th-century laissez-faire capitalism that led to popular movements promoting workplace safety and the move in recent decades toward deregulation and fewer restraints on industry that has led state and local prosecutors to criminalize some workplace accidents. Despite an increased federal presence, the activities of state and local district attorneys perhaps signal a redefinition of the popular understanding of employers' responsibility in maintaining a safe workplace.
在过去的20年里,在涉及工人在工作中死亡的案件中,越来越多的雇主被指控犯有过失杀人罪甚至谋杀罪。在这篇评论中,作者回顾了一些近期的此类案件,并审视了美国历史上其他一些时期,在这些时期,工人死亡被视为一种杀人形式。他研究了那些塑造我们如何界定工人死亡的社会力量:是将其视为一种意外的、偶然发生的事件,对此无人负责;还是将其视为对人命的严重漠视所导致的可预见结果,对此管理层应承担刑事责任。他提出疑问,19世纪导致推动工作场所安全的民众运动的自由放任资本主义状况,与近几十年来走向放松管制以及对行业限制减少从而导致州和地方检察官将一些工作场所事故认定为犯罪的情况之间,是否存在相似之处。尽管联邦政府的介入有所增加,但州和地方检察官的行动或许标志着民众对雇主在维护安全工作场所方面责任的理解正在重新界定。