Allen G D, Arndorfer P M
Department of Audiology and Speech Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Apr;43(2):441-55. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4302.441.
Studies of intonation in the hearing impaired (HI) are often concerned with either objective measures or listener perceptions. Less often has the focus been on how these two aspects of communication interrelate. This study examined the relationship between certain acoustic parameters and listeners' perceptions of intonation contours produced by HI children. Six severe-to-profound HI children and 6 normal-hearing (NH) children, ages 7;9 to 14;7, were individually tape recorded while reading 10 declarative sentences and 10 phonemically matched interrogative sentences within the context of a script. Each sentence ended with a carefully chosen disyllabic (target) word. Twelve adult listeners, inexperienced with the speech of the HI, listened to a randomized audio tape presentation of all of these productions and categorized each one as a statement, question, or other. Fundamental frequency (F0) and duration measurements were obtained for the target (final) word of each sentence, and intensity measures were recorded for each entire sentence. Acoustic analysis showed that all 6 of the NH children and 4 of the 6 HI children produced acoustically different intonation contours for declarative versus interrogative sentences. The HI children's productions were, in general, similar to the NH children, in that they used F0, duration, and intensity cues to mark the distinction. Their contrastive use of these acoustic cues, however, was less pronounced than for the NH children. Analysis of listener responses indicated that, although listeners were able to differentiate between some of the declarative and interrogative sentences produced by these 4 HI children, judgments corresponded with their intended type less often for the HI than for the NH children. (Judgments of NH children's utterances were 100% correct.) Multiple logistic regression of listeners' responses to the HI children's utterances showed that 4 acoustic measures, all derived from the sentence-final word, were significantly predictive: (1) sentence-final F0, (2) slope between the target word's initial and final F0, (3) duration of the target word, and (4) dB difference between the target word's 1st and 2nd syllables. Results were similar for the NH children's data, except that the ratio of the 2 syllables' durations was significant, rather than total word duration. These findings differ in several important ways from previously published data for HI children's intonation contours and suggest that many HI children have the ability to benefit substantially from training in the production of intonation.
关于听力受损(HI)儿童语调的研究通常关注客观测量或听众感知。较少关注的是沟通的这两个方面是如何相互关联的。本研究考察了某些声学参数与听众对HI儿童产生的语调轮廓的感知之间的关系。六名重度至极重度HI儿童和六名听力正常(NH)儿童,年龄在7岁9个月至14岁7个月之间,在阅读脚本中的10个陈述句和10个语音匹配的疑问句时分别进行了录音。每个句子都以精心挑选的双音节(目标)词结尾。12名不熟悉HI儿童语音的成年听众收听了所有这些发音的随机录音,并将每个发音归类为陈述句、疑问句或其他。对每个句子的目标(最后)词进行了基频(F0)和时长测量,并记录了每个完整句子的强度测量值。声学分析表明,6名NH儿童中的所有儿童以及6名HI儿童中的4名儿童,陈述句和疑问句产生了声学上不同的语调轮廓。HI儿童的发音总体上与NH儿童相似,因为他们使用F0、时长和强度线索来标记差异。然而,他们对这些声学线索的对比性使用不如NH儿童明显。听众反应分析表明,尽管听众能够区分这4名HI儿童产生的一些陈述句和疑问句,但与NH儿童相比,对HI儿童发音的判断与预期类型相符的情况较少。(对NH儿童话语的判断100%正确。)听众对HI儿童话语反应进行的多元逻辑回归表明,4个声学测量值,均来自句子末尾的词,具有显著的预测性:(1)句子末尾的F0,(2)目标词初始F0和最终F0之间的斜率,(3)目标词的时长,以及(4)目标词第一个和第二个音节之间的分贝差。NH儿童的数据结果相似,但不同的是两个音节时长的比例具有显著性,而不是整个词的时长。这些发现与之前发表的关于HI儿童语调轮廓的数据在几个重要方面有所不同,并表明许多HI儿童有能力从语调产生训练中大幅受益。