Suppr超能文献

促进姑息治疗中的日常决策。

Facilitating day-to-day decision making in palliative care.

作者信息

Bottorff J L, Steele R, Davies B, Porterfield P, Garossino C, Shaw M

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Cancer Nurs. 2000 Apr;23(2):141-50. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200004000-00011.

Abstract

As part of a larger grounded theory study investigating the process by which palliative care patients make everyday choices, a secondary analysis of data was conducted to investigate the ways nurses support or restrict patients' participation in their care. Constant comparative methods were used to generate a detailed, contextually grounded description of nurses' strategies that influenced patients' participation in making everyday choices about their personal and nursing care. Data consisted of field notes derived from observations of patients and their caregivers in two hospital-based palliative care units and from 23 transcripts of interviews with participating nurses and patients. Nurses' efforts to support patients' participation in decision making were described as a four-phase process: getting to know the patient, enhancing opportunities for choice, being open to patient choice, and respecting choice. Factors influencing nurses' use of supportive behaviors and behaviors that restricted patients' participation in everyday choices were identified. Given the importance patients attributed to making choices, these findings provide a foundation for the design of nursing interventions that hold great potential for directly influencing quality of life.

摘要

作为一项更大规模的扎根理论研究的一部分,该研究旨在探究姑息治疗患者做出日常选择的过程,我们对数据进行了二次分析,以调查护士支持或限制患者参与自身护理的方式。采用持续比较法,对影响患者参与个人护理和护理决策日常选择的护士策略进行了详细的、基于情境的描述。数据包括在两个医院姑息治疗病房对患者及其护理人员进行观察所得到的实地记录,以及对参与研究的护士和患者进行访谈的23份文字记录。护士支持患者参与决策的努力被描述为一个四阶段过程:了解患者、增加选择机会、接受患者选择、尊重选择。确定了影响护士使用支持性行为的因素以及限制患者参与日常选择的行为。鉴于患者对做出选择的重视程度,这些发现为护理干预措施的设计奠定了基础,这些干预措施对于直接影响生活质量具有巨大潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验