Suppr超能文献

急诊科急性心脏缺血的漏诊

Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department.

作者信息

Pope J H, Aufderheide T P, Ruthazer R, Woolard R H, Feldman J A, Beshansky J R, Griffith J L, Selker H P

机构信息

Center for Cardiovascular Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Boston, Mass 02111, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 20;342(16):1163-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004203421603.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discharging patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina from the emergency department because of missed diagnoses can have dire consequences. We studied the incidence of, factors related to, and clinical outcomes of failure to hospitalize patients with acute cardiac ischemia.

METHODS

We analyzed clinical data from a multicenter, prospective clinical trial of all patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggesting acute cardiac ischemia who presented to the emergency departments of 10 U.S. hospitals.

RESULTS

Of 10,689 patients, 17 percent ultimately met the criteria for acute cardiac ischemia (8 percent had acute myocardial infarction and 9 percent had unstable angina), 6 percent had stable angina, 21 percent had other cardiac problems, and 55 percent had noncardiac problems. Among the 889 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 19 (2.1 percent) were mistakenly discharged from the emergency department (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.1 percent); among the 966 patients with unstable angina, 22 (2.3 percent) were mistakenly discharged (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.2 percent). Multivariable analysis showed that patients who presented to the emergency department with acute cardiac ischemia were more likely not to be hospitalized if they were women less than 55 years old (odds ratio for discharge, 6.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 32.5), were nonwhite (odds ratio, 2.2; 1.1 to 4.3), reported shortness of breath as their chief symptom (odds ratio, 2.7; 1.1 to 6.5), or had a normal or nondiagnostic electrocardiogram (odds ratio, 3.3; 1.7 to 6.3). Patients with acute infarction were more likely not to be hospitalized if they were nonwhite (odds ratio for discharge, 4.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 11.8) or had a normal or nondiagnostic electrocardiogram (odds ratio, 7.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.9 to 20.2). For the patients with acute infarction, the risk-adjusted mortality ratio for those who were not hospitalized, as compared with those who were, was 1.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 5.2), and for the patients with unstable angina, it was 1.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 17.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of patients who present to the emergency department with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina who are not hospitalized is low, but the discharge of such patients is associated with increased mortality. Failure to hospitalize is related to race, sex, and the absence of typical features of cardiac ischemia. Continued efforts to reduce the number of missed diagnoses are warranted.

摘要

背景

因漏诊而将急性心肌梗死或不稳定型心绞痛患者从急诊科放走可能会产生严重后果。我们研究了急性心脏缺血患者未住院的发生率、相关因素及临床结局。

方法

我们分析了一项多中心前瞻性临床试验的临床数据,该试验纳入了所有因胸痛或其他提示急性心脏缺血症状而就诊于美国10家医院急诊科的患者。

结果

在10689例患者中,17%最终符合急性心脏缺血标准(8%患有急性心肌梗死,9%患有不稳定型心绞痛),6%患有稳定型心绞痛,21%有其他心脏问题,55%有非心脏问题。在889例急性心肌梗死患者中,19例(2.1%)被错误地从急诊科放走(95%置信区间为1.1%至3.1%);在966例不稳定型心绞痛患者中,22例(2.3%)被错误地放走(95%置信区间为1.3%至3.2%)。多变量分析显示,因急性心脏缺血就诊于急诊科的患者,如果是年龄小于55岁的女性(出院比值比为6.7;95%置信区间为1.4至32.5)、非白人(比值比为2.2;1.1至4.3)、以气短为主要症状(比值比为2.7;1.1至6.5)或心电图正常或无诊断意义(比值比为3.3;1.7至6.3),则更有可能未被住院。急性心肌梗死患者如果是非白人(出院比值比为4.5;95%置信区间为1.8至11.8)或心电图正常或无诊断意义(比值比为7.7;95%置信区间为2.9至20.2),则更有可能未被住院。对于急性心肌梗死患者,未住院患者与住院患者相比,风险调整后的死亡率比值为1.9(95%置信区间为0.7至5.2),对于不稳定型心绞痛患者,该比值为1.7(95%置信区间为0.2至17.0)。

结论

因急性心肌梗死或不稳定型心绞痛就诊于急诊科但未住院的患者比例较低,但此类患者出院与死亡率增加相关。未住院与种族、性别以及缺乏心脏缺血的典型特征有关。有必要持续努力减少漏诊数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验