Suppr超能文献

氧疗技术与设备。

Oxygen-conserving techniques and devices.

作者信息

McCoy R

机构信息

Valley Inspired Products LLC, Savage, MN 55378, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2000 Jan;45(1):95-103; discussion 104.

Abstract

OCDs are available and their use is growing in the home care market because of economic factors associated with LTOT, but this trend has evolved with little clinical research. There is great variability among the oxygen control systems, and physicians need to test patients on each device, at each activity level the patient is capable of in the home, and to write a prescription for each activity level. OCDs should be used because of the patient benefits of improved activity and compliance with a 24-hour prescription, and the economic benefit associated with reduced delivery of oxygen. Clinicians and patients need to be thoroughly familiar with the oxygen system they are using and to understand its capabilities and limitations. More research is required to evaluate the application and effectiveness of and the differences between products and outcomes of OCDs used in home care. Equivalency between CFO and OCDs should not be necessary because of the differences between these delivery methods and the great variability of products.

摘要

家庭氧疗浓缩器(OCDs)已可获得,并且由于与长期氧疗(LTOT)相关的经济因素,其在家庭护理市场中的使用正在增加,但这种趋势在几乎没有临床研究的情况下演变而来。氧控制系统之间存在很大差异,医生需要在患者家中能够进行的每个活动水平下,对患者使用的每台设备进行测试,并为每个活动水平开具处方。应使用家庭氧疗浓缩器,因为它能使患者活动能力得到改善,有助于患者遵守24小时吸氧处方,还能带来与减少氧气输送相关的经济效益。临床医生和患者需要彻底熟悉他们正在使用的氧气系统,并了解其功能和局限性。需要更多研究来评估家庭护理中使用的家庭氧疗浓缩器的应用、有效性以及产品与结果之间的差异。由于这些输送方式之间的差异以及产品的巨大变异性,持续流量吸氧(CFO)和家庭氧疗浓缩器之间不必等同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验