Suppr超能文献

在甲状腺细针穿刺中,薄层涂片与直接涂片的比较。

Thin layer compared to direct smear in thyroid fine needle aspiration.

作者信息

Scurry J P, Duggan M A

机构信息

Mercy Pathology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 2000 Apr;11(2):104-15. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00228.x.

Abstract

The efficacy of preparing thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNAs) by the thin layer as opposed to the direct smear method has not been evaluated sufficiently in a regional laboratory setting. At the Foothills Hospital (Calgary, Canada), the method of processing thyroid FNAs was changed from direct smear to thin layer in January 1996. The results of 327 patients who had direct smear from 1994 to 1995 were compared to 401 who had thin layer between 1996 and 1997. While there were no significant differences across a broad range of quality indicators, thin layer showed a trend towards a higher proportion of true benign diagnoses (31% vs 24%), a lower proportion of inadequate specimens (41% vs 50%) and, most importantly, a lower false negative rate (3% vs 9%). In conclusion, the changeover to thin layer did not compromise the interpretation of thyroid FNAs.

摘要

与直接涂片法相比,薄层法制备甲状腺细针穿刺抽吸物(FNA)的效果在地区实验室环境中尚未得到充分评估。在山麓医院(加拿大卡尔加里),1996年1月甲状腺FNA的处理方法从直接涂片改为薄层法。将1994年至1995年采用直接涂片法的327例患者的结果与1996年至1997年采用薄层法的401例患者的结果进行了比较。虽然在广泛的质量指标上没有显著差异,但薄层法显示出真正良性诊断比例较高的趋势(31%对24%),不合格标本比例较低(41%对50%),最重要的是,假阴性率较低(3%对9%)。总之,改用薄层法并未影响甲状腺FNA的判读。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验