Norcia A M, Harrad R A, Brown R J
Smith Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
Neuroreport. 2000 Apr 7;11(5):1007-12. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200004070-00022.
Patients with strabismus or anisometropic amblyopia fixate and attend with one eye and suppress the image from the other eye. Here we use a visual evoked potential technique to show that patients who lack normal stereopsis retain suppressive binocular interactions but lack a characteristic form of non-linear binocular interaction that is present in normal observers. Oscillating grating targets presented at different temporal frequencies in the two eyes evoke a strong response in normal observers at a frequency equal to the sum of the two input frequencies for fusable targets but not for rivalrous ones. However increasing contrast in one eye reduces the response amplitude from the other eye under either fusable (dichoptic masking) or rivalrous conditions. Stereo-deficient observers lack the sum-frequency response, but retain dichoptic masking interactions. Dichoptic masking is stronger when the masker is presented to the patients' dominant rather than non-dominant eyes, suggesting that a subset of preserved binocular inhibitory interactions form the basis of clinical suppression.
斜视或屈光参差性弱视患者用一只眼睛注视并关注,而抑制另一只眼睛的图像。在此,我们使用视觉诱发电位技术表明,缺乏正常立体视觉的患者保留了抑制性双眼相互作用,但缺乏正常观察者中存在的一种特征性非线性双眼相互作用形式。在两只眼睛中以不同时间频率呈现的振荡光栅目标,在正常观察者中,对于可融合目标,在等于两个输入频率之和的频率处会引发强烈反应,而对于竞争目标则不会。然而,在可融合(双眼分视掩蔽)或竞争条件下,增加一只眼睛的对比度会降低另一只眼睛的反应幅度。立体视觉缺陷的观察者缺乏和频反应,但保留双眼分视掩蔽相互作用。当掩蔽刺激呈现给患者的优势眼而非非优势眼时,双眼分视掩蔽更强,这表明保留的双眼抑制性相互作用的一个子集构成了临床抑制的基础。