急性缺血性脑卒中的溶栓治疗

Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.

作者信息

Wardlaw J M, del Zoppo G, Yamaguchi T

机构信息

Neurosciences Trials Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, UK, EH4 2XU.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000213.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The majority of strokes are due to blockage of an artery in the brain by a blood clot. Clot dissolving (or thrombolytic) drugs may reduce brain damage from the stroke, but may also cause serious bleeding in the brain. Thrombolytic therapy has now been evaluated in several randomised trials in acute ischaemic stroke.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the safety and efficacy of thrombolytic agents in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Cochrane Stroke Review Group search strategy plus ongoing contact with researchers and pharmaceutical companies. Last search conducted March 1999.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of any thrombolytic agent compared with control in patients with definite ischaemic stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer applied the inclusion criteria and extracted the data. Trial quality was assessed. The extracted data were verified by the principal investigators of all major trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen trials including 5216 patients were included. Fifteen trials were double-blind. The trials tested urokinase, streptokinase, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator or recombinant pro-urokinase. Two trials used intra-arterial administration but the rest used the intravenous route. About 50% of the data come from trials testing intravenous tissue Plasminogen Activator. Thrombolytic therapy significantly increased the odds of death within the first ten days (odds ratio [OR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48 to 2.32). The main cause of the increase in deaths was fatal intracranial haemorrhage following thrombolysis (OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.96 to 5.84). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage is also increased following thrombolysis (OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.79 to 4.45). Thrombolytic therapy also increased the odds of death at the end of follow-up (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13 to 1. 52). Despite this, thrombolytic therapy, administered up to six hours after ischaemic stroke, significantly reduced the proportion of patients who were dead or dependent (modified Rankin 3 to 6) at the end of follow-up (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94). For patients treated within three hours of stroke, thrombolytic therapy appeared more effective in reducing death or dependency (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74) with less adverse effect on death (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.47). There was heterogeneity between the trials that could have been due to : thrombolytic drug used, variation in the concomitant use of aspirin and heparin, severity of the stroke, and time to treatment. Trials testing intravenous recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator suggest that it may be associated with slightly less hazard and more benefit when given up to six hours after stroke - death within the first ten days OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.81, death at the end of follow-up OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.44, dead or dependent at the end of follow-up OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.92. One trial that tested thrombolysis plus aspirin showed an increase in deaths of patients given both drugs in combination compared with thrombolysis alone.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolytic therapy increases deaths within the first seven to ten days, and deaths at final follow-up. Thrombolytic therapy also significantly increases symptomatic and fatal intracranial haemorrhage. These risks are offset by a reduction in disability in survivors, so that there is, overall, a significant net reduction in the proportion of patients dead or dependent in activities of daily living. The data from trials using intravenous recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator, from which there is the most evidence on thrombolytic therapy so far, suggest that it may be associated with less hazard and more benefit. There was heterogeneity between the trials and the optimum criteria to identify the patients most likely to benefit and least likely to be harmed, the agent, dose, and route of administration, are not clear. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

摘要

背景

大多数中风是由于血凝块堵塞大脑中的动脉所致。溶栓药物可能会减轻中风造成的脑损伤,但也可能导致脑部严重出血。目前已在多项急性缺血性中风的随机试验中对溶栓疗法进行了评估。

目的

本综述的目的是评估溶栓药物对急性缺血性中风患者的安全性和疗效。

检索策略

Cochrane中风综述小组的检索策略,以及与研究人员和制药公司的持续联系。最近一次检索于1999年3月进行。

入选标准

将任何溶栓药物与确诊为缺血性中风患者的对照组进行比较的随机试验。

数据收集与分析

由一位综述员应用纳入标准并提取数据。对试验质量进行评估。提取的数据由所有主要试验的主要研究者进行核实。

主要结果

纳入了17项试验,共5216例患者。15项试验为双盲试验。这些试验测试了尿激酶、链激酶、重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂或重组纤溶酶原激活剂。两项试验采用动脉内给药,其余试验采用静脉给药途径。约50%的数据来自测试静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的试验。溶栓疗法显著增加了前十天内死亡的几率(优势比[OR]1.85,95%置信区间[CI]1.48至2.32)。死亡增加的主要原因是溶栓后致命性颅内出血(OR 4.15,95%CI 2.96至5.84)。溶栓后有症状的颅内出血也有所增加(OR 3.53,95%CI 2.79至4.45)。溶栓疗法还增加了随访结束时死亡的几率(OR 1.31,95%CI 1.13至1.52)。尽管如此,在缺血性中风后6小时内进行溶栓治疗,显著降低了随访结束时死亡或依赖(改良Rankin量表评分为3至6分)患者的比例(OR 0.83,95%CI 0.73至0.94)。对于在中风后3小时内接受治疗的患者,溶栓疗法在降低死亡或依赖方面似乎更有效(OR 0.58,95%CI 0.46至0.74),对死亡的不良影响较小(OR 1.11,95%CI 0.84至1.47)。试验之间存在异质性,这可能是由于:使用的溶栓药物、阿司匹林和肝素联合使用的差异、中风的严重程度以及治疗时间。测试静脉注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的试验表明,在中风后6小时内给药时,它可能具有稍低的风险和更大的益处——前十天内死亡OR 1.24,95%CI 0.85至1.81,随访结束时死亡OR 1.16,95%CI 0.94至1.44,随访结束时死亡或依赖OR 0.79,95%CI 0.68至0.92。一项测试溶栓加阿司匹林的试验表明,与单独溶栓相比,联合使用两种药物的患者死亡人数增加。

综述作者结论

溶栓疗法增加了前七至十天内的死亡人数以及最终随访时的死亡人数。溶栓疗法还显著增加了有症状的和致命的颅内出血。这些风险被幸存者残疾的减少所抵消,因此总体而言,死亡或依赖日常生活活动的患者比例有显著的净减少。使用静脉注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的试验数据(目前关于溶栓疗法的证据最多)表明,它可能风险更低、益处更大。试验之间存在异质性,目前尚不清楚识别最可能受益和最不可能受伤害患者以及药物、剂量和给药途径的最佳标准。(摘要截选)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索