Suppr超能文献

动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的抗纤溶治疗

Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

作者信息

Roos Y B, Rinkel G J, Vermeulen M, Algra A, van Gijn J

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001245.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Re-bleeding is an important cause of death and disability in people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. This is probably due to dissolution of the clot by natural fibrinolytic activity.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effect of antifibrinolytic treatment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register and reference lists of articles. We also contacted drug companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing oral or intravenous antifibrinolytic drugs (tranexamic acid, epsilon amino-caproic acid or an equivalent) with control in people with confirmed subarachnoid haemorrhage.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted the data. All five reviewers assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials involving 937 patients were included. Based on 579 patients in two trials, antifibrinolytic treatment did not show any benefit for poor outcome (death, vegetative state or severe disability) with an odds ratio of 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.46. Death from all causes was not significantly influenced by treatment across all eight trials (odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.26). Antifibrinolytic treatment reduced the risk of re-bleeding reported at the end of follow-up, with some heterogeneity between the trials (odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.81). Treatment increased the risk of cerebral ischaemia in four trials (odds ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.40 to 2.94). Antifibrinolytic treatment showed no effect on the reported rate of hydrocephalus in four trials (odds ratio 1. 05, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.56).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Antifibrinolytic treatment does not appear to benefit people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. However, the trials were all done more than 10 years ago. New strategies may counteract the ischaemia-inducing potential of antifibrinolytic treatment and lead to improved outcome. A trial of combined antifibrinolytic and anti-ischaemia treatment is underway.

摘要

背景

再出血是动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者死亡和致残的重要原因。这可能是由于天然纤维蛋白溶解活性使血凝块溶解所致。

目的

本综述的目的是评估抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的疗效。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane卒中小组试验注册库和文章的参考文献列表。我们还联系了制药公司。

入选标准

比较口服或静脉注射抗纤维蛋白溶解药物(氨甲环酸、ε-氨基己酸或等效药物)与确诊蛛网膜下腔出血患者对照组的随机试验。

数据收集与分析

两名综述作者独立选择纳入试验并提取数据。所有五名综述作者评估试验质量。

主要结果

纳入了八项涉及937例患者的试验。基于两项试验中的579例患者,抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗对不良结局(死亡、植物状态或严重残疾)未显示出任何益处,比值比为1.05,95%置信区间为0.76至1.46。在所有八项试验中,治疗对各种原因导致的死亡没有显著影响(比值比0.96,95%置信区间0.72至1.26)。抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗降低了随访结束时报告的再出血风险,试验之间存在一定异质性(比值比0.59,95%置信区间0.42至0.81)。四项试验中治疗增加了脑缺血风险(比值比2.03,95%置信区间1.40至2.94)。四项试验中抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗对报告的脑积水发生率没有影响(比值比1.05,95%置信区间0.71至1.56)。

综述作者结论

抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗似乎对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者没有益处。然而,这些试验都是在10多年前进行的。新的策略可能会抵消抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗诱发缺血的可能性并改善结局。一项抗纤维蛋白溶解和抗缺血联合治疗的试验正在进行中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验