Suppr超能文献

哮喘的屋尘螨控制措施

House dust mite control measures for asthma.

作者信息

Hammarquist C, Burr M L, Gotzsche P C

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001187.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The major allergen in house dust comes from mites. Chemical, physical and combined methods of reducing mite allergen levels are intended to reduce asthma symptoms in people who are sensitive to house dust mites.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of reducing exposure to house dust mite antigens in the homes of mite-sensitive asthmatics.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register, checked reference lists of articles and hand-searched Respiration (1980 to 1996) and Clinical and Experimental Allergy (1980 to 1996).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of mite control measures in asthmatic people known to be sensitive to house dust mites.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers applied the trial inclusion criteria and extracted the data independently. One reviewer applied the trial quality assessment criteria. Study authors were contacted to clarify information.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-three trials were included, with four trials awaiting assessment. There was little difference in improvement of asthma between people in experimental groups compared to control groups (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 2.18). Asthma symptom scores were also similar for the experimental and control groups (standardised mean difference -0. 06, 95% confidence interval -0.54 to 0.41). These scores showed a high degree of heterogeneity. No significant difference was noted for medication usage (standardised mean difference -0.14, 95% confidence interval -0.43 to 0.15). Peak flow in the morning showed no significant difference between the experimental and the control groups (standardised mean difference -0.03, 95% confidence interval -0.25 to 0.19).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Current chemical and physical methods aimed at reducing exposure to house dust mite allergens seem to be ineffective and cannot be recommended as prophylaxis for mite sensitive asthmatics.

摘要

背景

室内灰尘中的主要过敏原来自螨虫。减少螨虫过敏原水平的化学、物理及联合方法旨在减轻对屋尘螨敏感人群的哮喘症状。

目的

本综述的目的是评估在对螨虫敏感的哮喘患者家中减少接触屋尘螨抗原的效果。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane Airways Group试验注册库,检查了文章的参考文献列表,并手工检索了《呼吸》(1980年至1996年)和《临床与实验过敏》(1980年至1996年)。

入选标准

针对已知对屋尘螨敏感的哮喘患者进行螨虫控制措施的随机试验。

数据收集与分析

两名评审员应用试验纳入标准并独立提取数据。一名评审员应用试验质量评估标准。联系研究作者以澄清信息。

主要结果

纳入了23项试验,另有4项试验等待评估。与对照组相比,实验组人群哮喘改善情况差异不大(优势比1.2,95%置信区间0.66至2.18)。实验组和对照组的哮喘症状评分也相似(标准化均差 -0.06,95%置信区间 -0.54至0.41)。这些评分显示出高度的异质性。药物使用方面未观察到显著差异(标准化均差 -0.14,95%置信区间 -0.43至0.15)。早晨的峰值流量在实验组和对照组之间无显著差异(标准化均差 -0.03,95%置信区间 -0.25至0.19)。

综述作者结论

目前旨在减少接触屋尘螨过敏原的化学和物理方法似乎无效,不能推荐用于螨虫敏感哮喘患者的预防。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验