• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Oil-soluble versus water-soluble media for assessing tubal patency with hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy in subfertile women.在评估不孕女性输卵管通畅性时,用于子宫输卵管造影或腹腔镜检查的油溶性与水溶性介质。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;1996(2):CD000092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000092.
2
WITHDRAWN: Oil-soluble versus water-soluble media for assessing tubal patency with hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy in subfertile women.撤回:在评估不孕女性输卵管通畅性的子宫输卵管造影或腹腔镜检查中,油溶性与水溶性介质的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(4):CD000092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000092.
3
Tubal flushing for subfertility.输卵管通水治疗不孕症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD003718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003718.pub2.
4
Tubal flushing for subfertility.输卵管通液治疗不孕症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD003718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003718.
5
Tubal flushing for subfertility.输卵管通液治疗不孕症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD003718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003718.pub3.
6
Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility.治疗不孕症的盆腔手术技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD000221. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000221.pub3.
7
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non tubal infertility.宫腔内人工授精与输卵管精子灌注治疗非输卵管性不孕的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub2.
8
Postoperative procedures for improving fertility following pelvic reproductive surgery.盆腔生殖手术后提高生育能力的术后程序。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001897. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001897.
9
Antioxidants for male subfertility.抗氧化剂治疗男性不育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 4;5(5):CD007411. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007411.pub5.
10
Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility.治疗不孕症的盆腔手术技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000221. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000221.

引用本文的文献

1
Tubal flushing for subfertility.输卵管通液术治疗不孕症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 15;10(10):CD003718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003718.pub5.
2
Tubal flushing for subfertility.输卵管通液治疗不孕症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 1;2015(5):CD003718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003718.pub4.
3
Comparison of hysterosalpingography and transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy in patients with tubal factor infertility: a prospective cohort study.子宫输卵管造影术与经阴道水腹腔镜检查在输卵管因素不孕症患者中的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014 Jun;9(2):190-5. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.41055. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
4
Postoperative procedures for improving fertility following pelvic reproductive surgery.盆腔生殖手术后提高生育能力的术后程序。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD001897. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001897.pub2.
5
Assessing observational studies of medical treatments.评估医学治疗的观察性研究。
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2005 Sep 1;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-2-8.

在评估不孕女性输卵管通畅性时,用于子宫输卵管造影或腹腔镜检查的油溶性与水溶性介质。

Oil-soluble versus water-soluble media for assessing tubal patency with hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy in subfertile women.

作者信息

Vandekerckhove P, Watson A, Lilford R, Harada T, Hughes E

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology, University of Leeds, 34 Hyde Terrace, Leeds, Yorkshire, UK, LS2 9LN.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;1996(2):CD000092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000092.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD000092
PMID:10796691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10866108/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been debate in the literature for more than 40 years as to whether flushing of the Fallopian tubes enhances fertility and whether this presumed therapeutic effect is greater with oil-soluble media than with water-soluble media. A meta-analysis of the therapeutic role of oil-soluble contrast media at hysterosalpingography was published in March 1994 (Watson 1994). This Cochrane Review is an expansion and update of that overview.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of flushing the Fallopian tubes with oil- or water-soluble contrast media on subsequent pregnancy rates in infertility patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

  1. For randomised controlled trials (RCTs): we searched the Cochrane Subfertility Review Group specialised register of controlled trials. 2. For non-randomised controlled studies: Medline and manual search of eight relevant journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Six RCTs and six non-randomised controlled studies. In two studies tubal flushing was compared with no treatment-controls. Eleven studies, comprising a total of 2635 subjects, compared oil- with water-soluble media.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Independently by first 2 authors for: 1. Methodological trial characteristics 2. Characteristics of participants 3.

OUTCOMES

the main studied outcome was pregnancy rate per patient

MAIN RESULTS

In comparison with no treatment, a significant benefit on pregnancy rates was seen by flushing the tubes with oil-soluble media (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.29-2.50) but not with water-soluble media (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.50-1.52). In the direct comparison of oil- and water-soluble media the former lead to significantly higher pregnancy rates (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.60-2.29). The treatment effect appeared similar in RCTs and non-RCTs. Subgroup analysis suggested the therapeutic benefit was greatest for patients suffering from unexplained infertility and least for those with tubal factor infertility.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Flushing of the tubes with oil-soluble media increases subsequent pregnancy rates in infertility patients. The hypothesis that tubal "plugs" are a cause of proximal tubal occlusion and that oil-soluble media may flush them out, is supported by new techniques such as falloposcopy. Clinicians should consider flushing the tubes with OSCM before contemplating more invasive therapies.

摘要

背景

40多年来,关于输卵管冲洗是否能提高生育能力以及这种假定的治疗效果在油溶性介质中是否比水溶性介质中更显著,文献中一直存在争议。1994年3月发表了一项关于油溶性造影剂在子宫输卵管造影术中治疗作用的荟萃分析(沃森,1994年)。本Cochrane系统评价是该综述的扩展和更新。

目的

评估用油溶性或水溶性造影剂冲洗输卵管对不孕患者后续妊娠率的影响。

检索策略

  1. 对于随机对照试验(RCT):我们检索了Cochrane不育症综述小组专门的对照试验注册库。2. 对于非随机对照研究:检索Medline并人工检索8种相关期刊。

选择标准

6项RCT和6项非随机对照研究。在两项研究中,将输卵管冲洗与未治疗对照组进行了比较。11项研究,共2635名受试者,比较了油溶性介质与水溶性介质。

数据收集与分析

由前两位作者独立进行:1. 试验方法学特征2. 参与者特征3.

结果

主要研究结果是每位患者的妊娠率

主要结果

与未治疗相比,用油溶性介质冲洗输卵管对妊娠率有显著益处(OR 1.80,95%CI 1.29 - 2.50),但用水溶性介质冲洗则没有(OR 0.87,95%CI 0.50 - 1.52)。在油溶性介质和水溶性介质的直接比较中,前者导致显著更高的妊娠率(OR 1.92,95%CI 1.60 - 2.29)。RCT和非RCT中的治疗效果似乎相似。亚组分析表明,治疗益处对于不明原因不孕患者最大,对于输卵管因素不孕患者最小。

综述作者结论

用油溶性介质冲洗输卵管可提高不孕患者的后续妊娠率。输卵管“堵塞”是近端输卵管阻塞的原因且油溶性介质可能将其冲开这一假说,得到了输卵管镜检查等新技术的支持。临床医生在考虑更具侵入性的治疗之前,应考虑用油溶性造影剂冲洗输卵管。