Acuin J, Smith A, Mackenzie I
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, De La Salle University, College of Medicine, Dasmarinas, Cavite, Philippines.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000473. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000473.
Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a serious bacterial infection of the middle ear that can follow untreated acute otitis media.
To assess the effects of different treatments for CSOM.
We searched Medline from 1966 to 1996 and a bibliographic collection of the Hearing Impairment Research Group in Liverpool, UK. We handsearched two otolaryngology journals and contacted members of an international hearing network.
Randomized trials of any method of management for patients with eardrum perforation and persistent otorrhea.
Three reviewers independently assessed eligibility and trial quality. One reviewer extracted data. We contacted investigators for clarifications.
Twenty-four trials involving 1660 people were included. Clinical definitions and severity of CSOM varied, methodological quality was generally low and follow-up was short. Treatment with antibiotics or antiseptics accompanied by aural toilet was more effective in resolving otorrhea than no treatment (two trials, odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0. 57) or aural toilet alone (six trials, odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.43). Topical treatment with antibiotics or antiseptics was more effective than systemic antibiotics (six trials, odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 0.69). Combining topical and systemic antibiotics was not more effective than topical antibiotics. Topical quinolones were more effective than non-quinolones (five trials, odds ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.41). No difference in the effectiveness of topical antibiotics and topical antiseptics was found (three studies, odds ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 2.81). Some topical antibiotic combinations may be more effective than others in resolving otorrhea. Rates of adverse drug events were low and equal between groups.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of CSOM with aural toilet and topical antibiotics, particularly quinolones, is effective in resolving otorrhea and eradicating bacteria from the middle ear. Longterm outcomes such as preventing recurrences, closure of tympanic perforation and hearing improvement need to be further evaluated.
慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)是一种严重的中耳细菌感染,可继发于未经治疗的急性中耳炎。
评估CSOM不同治疗方法的效果。
我们检索了1966年至1996年的医学索引数据库以及英国利物浦听力障碍研究小组的文献目录集。我们手工检索了两本耳鼻喉科杂志,并联系了一个国际听力网络的成员。
针对鼓膜穿孔和持续性耳漏患者的任何治疗方法的随机试验。
三位评价者独立评估入选资格和试验质量。一位评价者提取数据。我们联系研究者进行澄清。
纳入了涉及1660人的24项试验。CSOM的临床定义和严重程度各不相同,方法学质量普遍较低,随访时间较短。抗生素或防腐剂治疗并辅以耳道清理在解决耳漏方面比不治疗(两项试验,优势比0.37,95%置信区间0.24至0.57)或仅耳道清理(六项试验,优势比0.31,95%置信区间0.23至0.43)更有效。局部使用抗生素或防腐剂比全身使用抗生素更有效(六项试验,优势比0.46,95%置信区间0.30至0.69)。联合局部和全身使用抗生素并不比局部使用抗生素更有效。局部使用喹诺酮类药物比非喹诺酮类药物更有效(五项试验,优势比0.26,95%置信区间0.16至0.41)。未发现局部使用抗生素和局部使用防腐剂的有效性存在差异(三项研究,优势比1.34,95%置信区间0.64至2.81)。一些局部抗生素组合在解决耳漏方面可能比其他组合更有效。药物不良事件发生率较低,且组间相同。
用耳道清理和局部使用抗生素,特别是喹诺酮类药物治疗CSOM,在解决耳漏和清除中耳细菌方面是有效的。预防复发、鼓膜穿孔闭合和听力改善等长期结果需要进一步评估。