Schierhout G, Roberts I
7 Barton Road, Greenside, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001049.
Mannitol is sometimes dramatically effective in reversing acute brain swelling, but its effectiveness in the on-going management of severe head injury remains open to question. There is evidence that in prolonged dosage mannitol may pass from the blood into the brain, where it might cause reverse osmotic shifts that increase intracranial pressure.
To assess the effects of different mannitol therapy regimens, of mannitol compared to other intracranial pressure (ICP) lowering agents, and to quantify the effectiveness of mannitol administration given at other stages following acute traumatic brain injury.
The review drew on the search strategy for the Injuries Group as a whole. We checked reference lists of trials and review articles, and contacted authors of trials.
Randomised trials of mannitol, in patients with acute traumatic brain injury of any severity. The comparison group could be placebo-controlled, no drug, different dose, or different drug. Trials where the intervention was started more than eight weeks after injury, and cross-over trials were excluded.
The reviewers independently rated quality of allocation concealment and extracted the data. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each trial on an intention to treat basis.
Overall there were few eligible trials. There were no trials comparing different doses, or type of administration. One trial compared ICP-directed therapy to 'standard care' (RR for death= 0.83; 95% CI 0.47;1.46). One trial compared mannitol to pentobarbital (RR for death = 0.85; 95% CI 0. 52;1.38). No trials compared mannitol to other ICP lowering agents. One trial tested the effectiveness of pre-hospital administration of mannitol against placebo (RR for death=1.59; 95% CI 0.44;5.79).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There are insufficient data to recommend one form of mannitol infusion over another. Mannitol therapy for raised ICP may have a beneficial effect on mortality when compared to pentobarbital treatment. ICP-directed treatment shows a small beneficial effect compared to treatment directed by neurological signs and physiological indicators. There are insufficient data on the effectiveness of pre-hospital administration of mannitol to preclude either a harmful or a beneficial effect on mortality.
甘露醇有时在逆转急性脑肿胀方面效果显著,但其在严重颅脑损伤持续治疗中的有效性仍存在疑问。有证据表明,长期使用甘露醇可能会从血液进入大脑,在大脑中可能引发反向渗透转移,从而增加颅内压。
评估不同甘露醇治疗方案的效果,比较甘露醇与其他降低颅内压(ICP)药物的效果,并量化急性创伤性脑损伤后其他阶段给予甘露醇治疗的有效性。
本综述采用了整个损伤组的检索策略。我们查阅了试验和综述文章的参考文献列表,并联系了试验的作者。
针对任何严重程度的急性创伤性脑损伤患者进行的甘露醇随机试验。对照组可以是安慰剂对照、无药物、不同剂量或不同药物。排除干预在受伤八周后开始的试验和交叉试验。
综述作者独立评估分配隐藏的质量并提取数据。每个试验均按意向性分析计算相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
总体而言,符合条件的试验很少。没有试验比较不同剂量或给药方式。一项试验将ICP导向治疗与“标准护理”进行了比较(死亡RR = 0.83;95%CI 0.47;1.46)。一项试验将甘露醇与戊巴比妥进行了比较(死亡RR = 0.85;95%CI 0.52;1.38)。没有试验将甘露醇与其他降低ICP的药物进行比较。一项试验测试了院前给予甘露醇与安慰剂相比的有效性(死亡RR = 1.59;95%CI 0.44;5.79)。
没有足够的数据推荐一种甘露醇输注方式优于另一种。与戊巴比妥治疗相比,甘露醇治疗ICP升高可能对死亡率有有益影响。与根据神经体征和生理指标进行的治疗相比,ICP导向治疗显示出较小的有益效果。关于院前给予甘露醇的有效性,没有足够的数据排除其对死亡率的有害或有益影响。