van Pinxteren B, Numans M E, Bonis P A, Lau J
Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 80045, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3508 TA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD002095. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002095.
BACKGROUND: Heartburn affects 25% of the adult population on a monthly basis and represents the core symptom of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Treatment is readily available and puts a large demand on healthcare budgets. Research in the past has focused largely on the treatment of oesophagitis. A majority of GORD patients show no endoscopic abnormalities and in daily practice most patients are treated empirically. OBJECTIVES: Summarise, quantify and compare the efficacy of the short-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) and prokinetics in the empirical treatment of GORD and the treatment of endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD). SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches were performed of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Bibliographies were screened. SELECTION CRITERIA: Included were randomised controlled trials focussing on symptomatic outcome after short-term treatment for GORD using proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists or prokinetic agents. Participants had to be classifiable in the empirical treatment group (no endoscopy used in treatment allocation) or in the endoscopy negative reflux disease group (no endoscopic signs of erosive oesophagitis). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data from included trials were extracted by two reviewers independently. The impact of interventions was expressed as relative risks (RR) together with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Meta-analysis was only performed if there were sufficient trials of similar comparisons reporting the same outcomes. Relative risks were combined for binary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-one trials were included: eleven in the empirical treatment group, seven in the ENRD group and three in both. In empirical treatment of GORD the RR for heartburn remission in placebo-controlled trials for PPI was 0.35 (1 trial, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.46), for H2RAs 0.77 (2 trials, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99) and for prokinetics 0.86 (1 trial, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.01). In direct comparison PPIs were significantly (p<0.05) more effective than H2RAs (3 trials, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.80) and prokinetic's (2 trials, RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87). In treatment of ENRD, RR for heartburn remission for PPI versus placebo was 0.68 (4 trials, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.88) and for H2RA versus placebo was 0.84 (2 trials, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95). The RR for PPI versus H2RA was 0.69 (2 trials, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.20) and versus prokinetic 0.72 (1 trial, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this review suggest that antisecretory drugs are effective in the empirical treatment of complaints likely to originate from GORD and in treatment of ENRD and furthermore that PPIs are superior to H2RAs in empirical treatment of typical GORD symptoms.
背景:胃灼热每月影响25%的成年人口,是胃食管反流病(GORD)的核心症状。治疗方法容易获得,对医疗保健预算有很大需求。过去的研究主要集中在食管炎的治疗上。大多数GORD患者没有内镜异常,在日常实践中,大多数患者是经验性治疗。 目的:总结、量化并比较质子泵抑制剂(PPI)、H2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)和促动力药在GORD经验性治疗及内镜阴性反流病(ENRD)治疗中的短期疗效。 检索策略:对Cochrane对照试验注册库、MEDLINE和EMBASE进行了电子检索。筛选了参考文献。 入选标准:纳入的是聚焦于使用质子泵抑制剂、H2受体拮抗剂或促动力药对GORD进行短期治疗后的症状性结局的随机对照试验。参与者必须可分类到经验性治疗组(治疗分配中未使用内镜检查)或内镜阴性反流病组(无糜烂性食管炎的内镜征象)。 数据收集与分析:两名综述作者独立提取纳入试验的数据。干预措施的影响以相对风险(RR)及95%置信区间(95%CI)表示。仅当有足够数量的类似比较试验报告相同结局时才进行荟萃分析。对二分类结局合并相对风险。 主要结果:纳入了21项试验:经验性治疗组11项,ENRD组7项,两组均有的3项。在GORD的经验性治疗中,PPI在安慰剂对照试验中烧心缓解的RR为0.35(1项试验,95%CI 0.26至0.46),H2RA为0.77(2项试验,95%CI 0.60至0.99),促动力药为0.86(1项试验,95%CI 0.73至1.01)。直接比较时,PPI比H2RA显著更有效(p<0.05)(3项试验,RR 0.67,95%CI 0.57至0.80),比促动力药也显著更有效(2项试验,RR 0.53,95%CI 0.32至0.87)。在ENRD治疗中,PPI与安慰剂相比烧心缓解的RR为0.68(4项试验,95%CI 0.53至0.88),H2RA与安慰剂相比为0.84(2项试验,95%CI 0.74至0.95)。PPI与H2RA相比的RR为0.69(2项试验,95%CI 0.39至1.20),与促动力药相比为0.72(1项试验,95%CI 0.56至0.92)。 综述作者结论:本综述中的研究结果表明,抗分泌药物在可能源于GORD的症状的经验性治疗及ENRD治疗中有效,此外,在典型GORD症状的经验性治疗中,PPI优于H2RA。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-4-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007-4-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-6-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-4-18
Surg Endosc. 2011-11-1
West J Med. 2002-3