Jacob S, Balletshofer B, Henriksen E J, Volk A, Mehnert B, Löblein K, Häring H U, Rett K
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
Blood Press. 1999;8(5-6):261-8. doi: 10.1080/080370599439463.
Essential hypertension is--at least in many subjects--associated with a decrease in insulin sensitivity, while glycaemic control is (still) normal. It seems that in hypertensive patients, two major functions of insulin are impaired: there is insulin resistance of peripheral glucose uptake (primarily skeletal muscle) and insulin resistance of insulin-stimulated vasodilation. In view of some retrospective data and meta-analyses, which showed a less than expected reduction in coronary events (coronary paradox), the metabolic side effects of the antihypertensive treatment have received more attention. Many groups have shown that conventional antihypertensive treatment, both with beta-blockers and/or diuretics, decreases insulin sensitivity by various mechanisms. While low-dose diuretics seem to be free of these metabolic effects, there is no evidence for this in the beta-adrenergic blockers. However, recent metabolic studies evaluated the effects of vasodilating beta-blockers, such as dilevalol, carvedilol and celiprolol, on insulin sensitivity and the atherogenic risk factors. None of them decreased insulin sensitivity, as has been described for the beta-blockers with and without beta1 selectivity. This supports the idea that peripheral vascular resistance and peripheral blood flow play a central role in mediating the metabolic side effects of the beta-blocking agents, as the vasodilating action (either via beta2 stimulation or alpha1-blockade) seems to more than offset the detrimental effects of the blockade of beta (or beta1) receptors. Further studies are needed to elucidate the relevance of the radical scavenging properties of these agents and their connection to their metabolic effects. Therefore, the beneficial characteristics of these newer beta-adrenoreceptor blockers suggest that the vasodilating beta-blocking agents could be advantageous for hypertensive patients with insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes.
原发性高血压(至少在许多患者中)与胰岛素敏感性降低有关,而血糖控制(仍然)正常。似乎在高血压患者中,胰岛素的两个主要功能受损:外周葡萄糖摄取(主要是骨骼肌)存在胰岛素抵抗,以及胰岛素刺激的血管舒张存在胰岛素抵抗。鉴于一些回顾性数据和荟萃分析显示冠状动脉事件的减少低于预期(冠状动脉悖论),抗高血压治疗的代谢副作用受到了更多关注。许多研究小组表明,传统的抗高血压治疗,无论是使用β受体阻滞剂和/或利尿剂,都会通过各种机制降低胰岛素敏感性。虽然低剂量利尿剂似乎没有这些代谢作用,但β肾上腺素能阻滞剂尚无此证据。然而,最近的代谢研究评估了血管舒张性β受体阻滞剂,如双醋洛尔、卡维地洛和塞利洛尔,对胰岛素敏感性和动脉粥样硬化危险因素的影响。与具有或不具有β1选择性的β受体阻滞剂不同,这些药物均未降低胰岛素敏感性。这支持了这样一种观点,即外周血管阻力和外周血流量在介导β受体阻滞剂的代谢副作用中起核心作用,因为血管舒张作用(通过β2刺激或α1阻断)似乎足以抵消阻断β(或β1)受体的有害影响。需要进一步研究来阐明这些药物的自由基清除特性及其与代谢作用的关系。因此,这些新型β肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂的有益特性表明,血管舒张性β受体阻滞剂可能对胰岛素抵抗或2型糖尿病的高血压患者有利。