Vallejo E, Dione D P, Bruni W L, Constable R T, Borek P P, Soares J P, Carr J G, Condos S G, Wackers F J, Sinusas A J
Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
J Nucl Med. 2000 May;41(5):874-82; discussion 883-6.
Quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) has been used for computation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. This study evaluated, first, the effect of injected dose, time of imaging, and background activity on the reproducibility of QGS and, second, the accuracy of QGS, compared with cine MRI, for determining left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions in dogs with and without perfusion defects.
Sixteen dogs were subjected to either chronic occlusion of the circumflex artery (group I, no perfusion defect) or acute occlusion of the anterior descending coronary artery (group II, perfusion defect). Both groups underwent serial MRI and SPECT.
( QGS was very reproducible using the automated program (r = 0.99997). Correlation between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 15 and 45 min was poor after the low-dose injection (r = 0.54; SE = 9%) and only fair after the high-dose injection (r = 0.77; SE = 5%). Correlation was poor in the presence of significant background activity (r = 0.36; SE = 12%). Correlation between QGS left ventricular volumes and MRI was good for group I (end-diastolic volume, r = 0.86; end-systolic volume, r = 0.81) and only fair for group II (end-diastolic volume, r = 0.66; end-systolic volume, r = 0.69). The overall LVEF correlation between QGS and MRI was poor (r = 0.51). QGS LVEF (mean +/- SD, 42% +/- 3%) overestimated MRI LVEF (29% +/- 2%).
QGS provides a highly reproducible estimate of LVEF. However, QGS is affected by changes in background activity, time of imaging, and injected dose. In the presence of perfusion defects, QGS overestimated volume relative to MRI. The correlation between QGS- and MRI-derived LVEF was poor in this canine model.
定量门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(QGS)已用于计算左心室容积和射血分数。本研究首先评估了注射剂量、成像时间和本底活性对QGS重复性的影响,其次评估了与电影磁共振成像(cine MRI)相比,QGS在确定有或无灌注缺损的犬类左心室容积和射血分数方面的准确性。
16只犬接受了左旋支动脉慢性闭塞(I组,无灌注缺损)或前降支冠状动脉急性闭塞(II组,有灌注缺损)。两组均接受了系列MRI和SPECT检查。
使用自动化程序时,QGS具有很高的重复性(r = 0.99997)。低剂量注射后,15分钟和45分钟时左心室射血分数(LVEF)之间的相关性较差(r = 0.54;标准误 = 9%),高剂量注射后仅为中等(r = 0.77;标准误 = 5%)。在存在显著本底活性的情况下,相关性较差(r = 0.36;标准误 = 12%)。I组中,QGS左心室容积与MRI之间的相关性良好(舒张末期容积,r = 0.86;收缩末期容积,r = 0.81),II组仅为中等(舒张末期容积,r = 0.66;收缩末期容积,r = 0.69)。QGS与MRI之间的总体LVEF相关性较差(r = 0.51)。QGS的LVEF(均值±标准差,42%±3%)高于MRI的LVEF(29%±2%)。
QGS对LVEF提供了高度可重复的估计。然而,QGS受本底活性、成像时间和注射剂量变化的影响。在存在灌注缺损的情况下,相对于MRI,QGS高估了容积。在这个犬类模型中,QGS衍生的LVEF与MRI衍生的LVEF之间的相关性较差。