Staessen J A, Thijs L
Hypertension and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Molecular and Cardiovascular Research, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Blood Press Monit. 2000 Apr;5(2):101-9.
Blood pressure is usually measured by conventional sphygmomanometry, a procedure fraught with many potential sources of error. Automated techniques of measurement, such as ambulatory monitoring and self-measurement, reduce the limitations of conventional sphygmomanometry. However, the diagnostic thresholds applicable for conventional sphygmomanometry cannot be extrapolated to automated measurements. During the past 10 years criteria for normality have gradually been developed for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. First, the distributions of the ambulatory blood pressure in normotensive subjects and in untreated hypertensive patients who had initially been classified on the basis of their conventional blood pressure were studied. Second, epidemiological studies were performed to investigate the distribution of the conventional and ambulatory blood pressures in the population at large. Third, authors of several studies have now validated the preliminary thresholds for ambulatory monitoring against left ventricular hypertrophy, other signs of target-organ damage and the incidence of cardiovascular complications. Finally, authors of clinical trials investigated whether it is beneficial to patients and cost-effective to diagnose and treat hypertension on the basis of ambulatory monitoring rather than under the sole guidance of conventional sphygmomanometry. For systolic/diastolic measurements, the upper limits of normotension include 130/80, 135/85 and 120/70 mmHg for the 24 h, daytime and night-time blood pressures, respectively. Whereas for ambulatory monitoring a large body of evidence currently supports the proposed diagnostic thresholds, for the self-recorded blood pressure, to a large extent, this evidence must still be collected. In pursuing this goal, the methods applied for ambulatory monitoring may serve as a template. On the basis of a meta-analysis of summary statistics of published articles and a meta-analysis of data from individual subjects, 135/85 mmHg is likely to be the upper limit of normality for the self-measured blood pressure. Obviously, this threshold is preliminary and must be further validated in prognostic studies. However, the present proposal could guide clinicians who wish to use self-measurement to refine the diagnosis and the management of hypertension based on conventional sphygmomanometry.
血压通常通过传统的血压计测量,该过程存在许多潜在误差来源。自动测量技术,如动态血压监测和自我测量,减少了传统血压计的局限性。然而,适用于传统血压计的诊断阈值不能外推到自动测量。在过去10年中,逐渐制定了动态血压监测的正常标准。首先,研究了血压正常者和最初根据传统血压分类的未经治疗的高血压患者的动态血压分布。其次,进行了流行病学研究,以调查普通人群中传统血压和动态血压的分布。第三,几项研究的作者现已根据左心室肥厚、其他靶器官损害迹象和心血管并发症的发生率,验证了动态血压监测的初步阈值。最后,临床试验的作者调查了基于动态血压监测而非仅在传统血压计的指导下诊断和治疗高血压对患者是否有益且具有成本效益。对于收缩压/舒张压测量,正常血压的上限分别为24小时、白天和夜间血压的130/80、135/85和120/70 mmHg。虽然目前大量证据支持动态血压监测提出的诊断阈值,但对于自我记录的血压,在很大程度上仍需收集此类证据。为实现这一目标,用于动态血压监测的方法可作为模板。基于对已发表文章汇总统计的荟萃分析和对个体受试者数据的荟萃分析,135/85 mmHg可能是自我测量血压正常的上限。显然,这个阈值是初步的,必须在预后研究中进一步验证。然而,本提议可为希望使用自我测量来完善基于传统血压计的高血压诊断和管理的临床医生提供指导。