Sagar K A, Smyth M R
School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Ireland.
Analyst. 2000 Mar;125(3):439-45. doi: 10.1039/a906364a.
A reliable multi-dimensional column chromatographic method employing amperometric detection using a carbon fibre microelectrode procedure was used for monitoring the plasma profiles and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of levodopa (L-dopa) and carbidopa (C-dopa), after ingestion of oral formulations containing these drugs. The peak currents obtained for the different analytes were directly proportional to the analyte over the concentration range 0.02-4 micrograms ml-1. Using this method, the minimum detectable concentration was estimated to be 5 and 8 ng ml-1 for L-dopa and C-dopa, respectively. Recovery studies ranged from 93.83 to 89.76%, with a relative standard deviation of less than 7%. The study was carried out in two separate weeks on five healthy non-patient fasted male/female volunteers in the age range 20-37 years and weighing between 60 kg and 78 kg. The pharmacokinetic profile of two controlled-release products containing both L-dopa and C-dopa (Sinemet CR3 and CR4) was compared on the one hand and Sinemet conventional tablets on the other. The pharmacokinetic parameters, peak concentration (Cmax), the time taken to obtain this level (Tmax), elimination half-time T1/2, elimination rate constant (Kel), plasma level ratio, fluctuation index (FI) and the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC0-8), were investigated for each individual formulation. A comparison of the uptake of L-dopa from the conventional formulation showed that L-dopa entered the plasma and achieved peak levels higher than that of the controlled release formulations. However, it showed a much higher fluctuation index and the plasma concentrations were more stable with the controlled release formulations. The data also indicated a very low accumulation of both levodopa and carbidopa following repeated administration of the drugs, which was consistent with their relatively short half-lives (less than 2 h). In contrast, the half-life for the metabolite 3-orthomethyl dopa (3-OMD) is in the order of 13 h. As a result, there was an extensive accumulation of 3-OMD and its levels were significantly higher than those of levodopa or carbidopa upon repeated administration. Urine recoveries of the three analytes over one 8 h dosing interval showed that the majority of the excreted levodopa and carbidopa was recovered during the first 4 h, and there is proportionally greater excretion of the carbidopa dose than the levodopa dose.
采用碳纤维微电极安培检测的可靠多维柱色谱法,用于监测口服含左旋多巴(L-多巴)和卡比多巴(C-多巴)制剂后血浆中这两种药物的浓度变化,并评估其药代动力学和生物利用度。在0.02 - 4微克/毫升的浓度范围内,不同分析物的峰电流与分析物浓度成正比。用该方法测得L-多巴和C-多巴的最低检测浓度分别为5纳克/毫升和8纳克/毫升。回收率研究范围为93.83%至89.76%,相对标准偏差小于7%。该研究在两个不同的星期内,对5名年龄在20 - 37岁、体重在60千克至78千克之间的健康非患者禁食男性/女性志愿者进行。一方面比较了两种含L-多巴和C-多巴的控释制剂(息宁控释片3和4)的药代动力学特征,另一方面与息宁常规片进行了比较。对每种制剂研究了药代动力学参数,包括峰浓度(Cmax)、达到该浓度所需时间(Tmax)、消除半衰期T1/2、消除速率常数(Kel)、血药浓度比、波动指数(FI)以及时间-浓度曲线下面积(AUC0 - 8)。常规制剂中L-多巴的吸收情况比较表明,L-多巴进入血浆并达到高于控释制剂的峰值水平。然而,其波动指数更高,而控释制剂的血浆浓度更稳定。数据还表明,重复给药后左旋多巴和卡比多巴的蓄积量非常低,这与其相对较短的半衰期(小于2小时)一致。相比之下,代谢物3 - 邻甲基多巴(3 - OMD)的半衰期约为13小时。因此,3 - OMD有广泛的蓄积,重复给药后其水平显著高于左旋多巴或卡比多巴。在一个8小时给药间隔内,三种分析物的尿回收率表明,大部分排泄的左旋多巴和卡比多巴在前4小时内回收,且卡比多巴剂量的排泄比例大于左旋多巴剂量。